ONEQ vs. HYP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. ONEQ is passively managed, while HYP is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.

Performance

ONEQ vs. HYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 13.30% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 36.25% return.

ONEQ

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 13.30%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 35.91%
• 3Y*: 25.75%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 19.90%

HYP

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: 6.37%
• YTD: 36.25%
• 6M: 30.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	13.30%	2.14%
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	36.25%	-6.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and HYP is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

HYP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ONEQ	HYP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.89	—	—

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and HYP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	HYP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-19.58%	-35.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	0.00%	-3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.94%	-6.44%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	HYP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.28%	42.95%	-25.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.33%	42.95%	-20.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.81%	42.95%	-21.14%

ONEQ vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than HYP's 0.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF	0.10%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.71%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEQ and HYP in my portfolio?

ONEQ and HYP have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ONEQ or HYP?

On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEQ or HYP?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEQ or HYP?

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

What is the main difference between ONEQ and HYP?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.85% for HYP.