HYP vs. AVUS
HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) and AVUS (Avantis U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Golden Eagle, while AVUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVUS.
Performance
HYP vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 36.25% return, which is significantly higher than AVUS's 14.87% return.
HYP
- 1D
- 2.01%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 36.25%
- 6M
- 30.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVUS
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 32.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
HYP vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 36.25% | -6.61% |
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 14.87% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYP and AVUS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYP vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank
HYP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVUS
HYP vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYP | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYP vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and AVUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYP | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -37.04% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -5.06% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.75% | — |
Volatility
HYP vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYP | AVUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.95% | 12.66% | +30.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.95% | 17.35% | +25.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.95% | 20.83% | +22.12% |
HYP vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYP vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison
HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than AVUS's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUS Avantis U.S. Equity ETF | 1.17% | 1.08% | 1.27% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 0.35% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYP and AVUS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.
HYP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.15% for AVUS.
Find the right allocation for HYP and AVUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer