PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYP vs. AVUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYP vs. AVUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYP achieves a 36.25% return, which is significantly higher than AVUS's 14.87% return.


HYP

1D
2.01%
1M
6.37%
YTD
36.25%
6M
30.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVUS

1D
0.11%
1M
1.87%
YTD
14.87%
6M
14.04%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
22.02%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYP vs. AVUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HYP
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF
36.25%-6.61%
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
14.87%2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HYP and AVUS is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYP vs. AVUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AVUS
AVUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYP vs. AVUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP) and Avantis U.S. Equity ETF (AVUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYPAVUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.77

HYP vs. AVUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYP vs. AVUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYP drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, smaller than the maximum AVUS drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYP and AVUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYPAVUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-37.04%

+17.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.44%

-5.06%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

Volatility

HYP vs. AVUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYPAVUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.95%

12.66%

+30.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.95%

17.35%

+25.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.95%

20.83%

+22.12%

HYP vs. AVUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYP vs. AVUS - Dividend Comparison

HYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than AVUS's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVUS
Avantis U.S. Equity ETF
1.17%1.08%1.27%1.41%1.59%1.08%1.19%0.35%
HYP
Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF
0.10%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYP and AVUS have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.

AVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.

HYP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while AVUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Golden Eagle and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for HYP and 0.15% for AVUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYP and AVUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer