PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEQ vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEQ achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 21.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEQ has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 19.57%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.17% annualized return.


ONEQ

1D
-0.50%
1M
-5.15%
YTD
9.43%
6M
7.78%
1Y
26.50%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
19.57%

FTEC

1D
-1.22%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
21.53%
6M
19.37%
1Y
40.07%
3Y*
29.33%
5Y*
19.40%
10Y*
25.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
9.43%20.89%29.30%45.73%-32.12%22.11%44.87%38.01%-3.18%29.29%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
21.53%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and FTEC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.95

The correlation between ONEQ and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEQ
FTEC

Technology

54.3%
98.3%

Communication Services

15.4%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
0.0%

Healthcare

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Financial Services

2.9%
0.6%

Industrials

2.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.9%
0.0%

Utilities

0.8%

-

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Energy

0.5%
0.3%

Technology

ONEQ
54.3%
FTEC
98.3%

Communication Services

ONEQ
15.4%
FTEC
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEQ
12.7%
FTEC
0.0%

Healthcare

ONEQ
4.7%
FTEC

-

Consumer Defensive

ONEQ
4.4%
FTEC

-

Financial Services

ONEQ
2.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Industrials

ONEQ
2.9%
FTEC
0.6%

Basic Materials

ONEQ
0.9%
FTEC
0.0%

Utilities

ONEQ
0.8%
FTEC

-

Real Estate

ONEQ
0.6%
FTEC

-

Energy

ONEQ
0.5%
FTEC
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEQFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.48

-0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

7.49

+0.35

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEQFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-34.95%

-20.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-16.26%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

-27.30%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-34.95%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

-34.95%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.59%

-9.23%

+2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-5.57%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

5.37%

-1.98%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) is 7.45%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.25%. This indicates that ONEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEQFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.45%

11.25%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

18.61%

-4.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.36%

22.76%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

25.60%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

24.84%

-3.07%

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEQ vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than FTEC's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.37%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.89%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ONEQ and FTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTEC has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to ONEQ (7.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.17% vs 19.57% for ONEQ. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.17% return vs 19.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for ONEQ.

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.37% for FTEC.

ONEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. ONEQ tracks Nasdaq Composite Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEQ and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer