ONEQ vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. ONEQ is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEQ returned 15.43%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ONEQ charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ONEQ having a 16.16% return and FBCG slightly lower at 15.59%.

ONEQ

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 7.21%
• YTD: 16.16%
• 6M: 15.18%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 27.68%
• 5Y*: 15.43%
• 10Y*: 19.68%

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	16.16%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	34.86%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEQ and FBCG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.97

The correlation between ONEQ and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEQ	FBCG
Technology	50.8%	48.3%
Communication Services	16.7%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	1.3%
Healthcare	5.1%	6.7%
Financial Services	3.1%	2.2%
Industrials	2.9%	5.7%
Basic Materials	1.0%	0.6%
Utilities	0.9%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.6%	0.7%
Energy	0.6%	0.4%

Return for Risk

ONEQ vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEQ	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	2.14	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	2.84	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.36	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.61	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.46	10.14	+2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEQ and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEQ	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48	2.14	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.62	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.83	-0.18

Drawdowns

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEQ drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEQ and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEQ	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-43.56%	-11.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-15.17%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.09%	-27.89%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.23%	-43.56%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.85%	-1.05%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-11.49%	+3.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.19%	3.90%	-0.71%

Volatility

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) is 4.20%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that ONEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEQ	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	4.79%	-0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	13.89%	-1.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	18.55%	-2.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.14%	25.79%	-3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	25.72%	-4.01%

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEQ has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ONEQ vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.67%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEQ and FBCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ONEQ and FBCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ONEQ or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to ONEQ (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEQ dropped -55.09% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, ONEQ or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 15.43% for ONEQ. On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, ONEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEQ or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 15.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEQ or FBCG?

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEQ or FBCG?

ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between ONEQ and FBCG?

Their fees differ too: 0.21% for ONEQ and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.