PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEO has outperformed PIE with an annualized return of 11.86%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.


ONEO

1D
0.09%
1M
5.26%
YTD
17.96%
6M
18.18%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.86%

PIE

1D
0.14%
1M
3.80%
YTD
39.30%
6M
38.92%
1Y
68.66%
3Y*
23.57%
5Y*
7.04%
10Y*
10.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEO vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
17.96%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.30%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%41.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and PIE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2015

0.56

The correlation between ONEO and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEO vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
PIE

Technology

21.9%
47.0%

Industrials

18.0%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%
1.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
5.1%

Financial Services

9.4%
14.4%

Energy

7.3%
5.4%

Utilities

5.8%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

4.7%
3.2%

Communication Services

3.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.9%
3.6%

Technology

ONEO
21.9%
PIE
47.0%

Industrials

ONEO
18.0%
PIE
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.6%
PIE
1.3%

Healthcare

ONEO
9.5%
PIE
5.1%

Financial Services

ONEO
9.4%
PIE
14.4%

Energy

ONEO
7.3%
PIE
5.4%

Utilities

ONEO
5.8%
PIE
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.4%
PIE
0.4%

Basic Materials

ONEO
4.7%
PIE
3.2%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.6%
PIE
1.4%

Real Estate

ONEO
2.9%
PIE
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEO vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONEOPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.54

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

6.99

-3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

22.90

-7.77

ONEO vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONEOPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

3.16

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.35

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.12

+0.51

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-72.98%

+32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-9.87%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-28.69%

+8.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-40.32%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-40.32%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.04%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-26.08%

+21.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

3.01%

-1.15%

Volatility

ONEO vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.67%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

8.88%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

17.74%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

21.87%

-9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

20.23%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

21.34%

-2.68%

ONEO vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEO vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.16%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and PIE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to ONEO (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 10-year performance, ONEO leads with 11.86% vs 10.06% for PIE. On fees, ONEO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEO has performed better with a 11.86% return vs 10.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

PIE has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 1.16% for ONEO.

ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer