PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEO vs. ONEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEO vs. ONEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ONEO having a 19.27% return and ONEY slightly lower at 18.31%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ONEO having a 11.76% annualized return and ONEY not far ahead at 12.04%.


ONEO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
6M
14.51%
YTD
19.27%
1Y
24.78%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
11.76%
ALL TIME*
11.54%

ONEY

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.86%
6M
12.45%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$103.19K$75.01K$61.74K
$5.01M$5.36M$5.13M

ONEO vs. ONEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
19.27%10.61%15.01%15.64%-12.01%26.72%10.76%26.53%-12.41%21.16%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
18.31%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEO and ONEY is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ONEO and ONEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ONEO vs. ONEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEO
ONEY

Industrials

19.0%
9.9%

Technology

16.9%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
11.0%

Healthcare

11.5%
5.0%

Financial Services

10.5%
17.8%

Energy

6.3%
7.9%

Utilities

5.8%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
11.5%

Basic Materials

5.1%
4.5%

Real Estate

3.8%
11.3%

Communication Services

3.5%
3.4%

Industrials

ONEO
19.0%
ONEY
9.9%

Technology

ONEO
16.9%
ONEY
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEO
11.9%
ONEY
11.0%

Healthcare

ONEO
11.5%
ONEY
5.0%

Financial Services

ONEO
10.5%
ONEY
17.8%

Energy

ONEO
6.3%
ONEY
7.9%

Utilities

ONEO
5.8%
ONEY
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

ONEO
5.6%
ONEY
11.5%

Basic Materials

ONEO
5.1%
ONEY
4.5%

Real Estate

ONEO
3.8%
ONEY
11.3%

Communication Services

ONEO
3.5%
ONEY
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEO vs. ONEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEO
ONEO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ONEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEO vs. ONEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEOONEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.20

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

11.88

+1.59

ONEO vs. ONEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the ONEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEO and ONEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEO vs. ONEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, smaller than the maximum ONEY drawdown of -46.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and ONEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEOONEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.86%

-46.80%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-7.61%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.72%

-17.50%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.39%

-18.93%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.86%

-46.80%

+5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.85%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-4.93%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.05%

-0.21%

Volatility

ONEO vs. ONEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 2.46%, while SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEOONEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

4.41%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

8.87%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

12.47%

+0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.06%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

19.81%

-1.20%

ONEO vs. ONEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEO and ONEY have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEO vs. ONEY - Dividend Comparison

ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ONEY's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEO
SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF
1.18%1.29%1.30%1.56%1.73%1.19%1.28%1.64%1.72%7.69%1.82%0.17%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.77%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEO and ONEY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ONEY has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to ONEO (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs ONEY's -46.80%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.04% vs 11.76% for ONEO. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 11.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEO and ONEY have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.18% for ONEO.

ONEO is categorized as Momentum, while ONEY is Mid Cap Value Equities. ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index.

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEO and ONEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer