ONEO vs. JMOM
ONEO (SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - ONEO tracks the Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEO returned 10.52%/yr vs 16.24%/yr for JMOM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
ONEO vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEO achieves a 17.96% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 22.57% return.
ONEO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 18.18%
- 1Y
- 28.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
JMOM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 36.34%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ONEO vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 17.96% | 10.61% | 15.01% | 15.64% | -12.01% | 26.72% | 10.76% | 26.53% | -12.41% | 5.39% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 22.57% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEO and JMOM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ONEO and JMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEO vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEO
JMOM
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
ONEO
JMOM
Industrials
ONEO
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
ONEO
JMOM
Healthcare
ONEO
JMOM
Financial Services
ONEO
JMOM
Energy
ONEO
JMOM
Utilities
ONEO
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
ONEO
JMOM
Basic Materials
ONEO
JMOM
Communication Services
ONEO
JMOM
Real Estate
ONEO
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEO vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
ONEO
JMOM
ONEO vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ONEO | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.45 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 4.64 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 21.99 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ONEO | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 2.55 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.87 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.82 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ONEO vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEO drawdown since its inception was -40.86%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEO and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEO | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.86% | -34.31% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -7.87% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.72% | -19.51% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.39% | -28.26% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.35% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -6.31% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.66% | +0.20% |
Volatility
ONEO vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is 3.67%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that ONEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEO | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 4.56% | -0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 11.56% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 14.31% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 18.65% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 20.13% | -1.47% |
ONEO vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEO vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
ONEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than JMOM's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEO SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.30% | 1.56% | 1.73% | 1.19% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 7.69% | 1.82% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEO and JMOM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to ONEO (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEO dropped -40.86% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 16.24% vs 10.52% for ONEO. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ONEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 16.24% return vs 10.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEO.
ONEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.72% for JMOM.
ONEO tracks Russell 1000 Momentum Focused Factor Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEO and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEO and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer