PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEH vs. LRNZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ONEH

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
6M
-1.04%
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

LRNZ

1D
1.01%
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$103.68K$133.76K$133.76K
$75.57K$59.30K$74.10K

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ONEH and LRNZ is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Equity Hedge ETF (ONEH) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEH drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEH and LRNZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEHLRNZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-11.91%

+8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-6.20%

+4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-5.75%

+4.25%

Volatility

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEHLRNZDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.04%

34.30%

-29.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

34.30%

-29.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

34.30%

-29.26%

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEH has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ONEH vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither ONEH nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ONEH and LRNZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LRNZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRNZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ONEH.

ONEH and LRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

ONEH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while LRNZ is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ONEH and 0.68% for LRNZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEH and LRNZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer