ONDS vs. KEN
ONDS (Ondas Holdings Inc.) and KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) are both stocks. ONDS operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, ONDS returned 2.67%/yr vs 31.84%/yr for KEN. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ONDS vs. KEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONDS achieves a -4.41% return, which is significantly lower than KEN's 14.26% return.
ONDS
- 1D
- -5.09%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 445.61%
- 3Y*
- 104.56%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- —
KEN
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -20.01%
- YTD
- 14.26%
- 6M
- 23.62%
- 1Y
- 115.93%
- 3Y*
- 57.99%
- 5Y*
- 31.84%
- 10Y*
- 41.88%
ONDS vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc. | -4.41% | 281.25% | 67.32% | -3.77% | -76.30% | -28.08% | -48.17% | 0.00% | 33.33% |
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 14.26% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 93.65% | 57.17% | 50.73% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONDS and KEN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
ONDS:
$1.54
KEN:
$1.54
ONDS:
6.06
KEN:
46.98
ONDS:
15.27
KEN:
3.80
ONDS:
$96.60M
KEN:
$1.01B
ONDS:
$43.33M
KEN:
$166.82M
ONDS:
-$75.39M
KEN:
$339.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONDS vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank
ONDS
KEN
ONDS vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONDS | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.42 | 4.42 | +4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.67 | 17.27 | +1.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONDS vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONDS drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than KEN's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONDS and KEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONDS | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.28% | -69.20% | -29.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.37% | -26.41% | -26.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.28% | -32.27% | -51.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.99% | -69.20% | -27.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.15% | -24.16% | -27.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.41% | -23.19% | -48.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.01% | 6.74% | +17.27% |
Volatility
ONDS vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison
Ondas Holdings Inc. (ONDS) has a higher volatility of 44.08% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) at 14.84%. This indicates that ONDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONDS | KEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.08% | 14.84% | +29.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.27% | 30.71% | +47.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.45% | 39.55% | +87.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.81% | 39.79% | +74.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 120.73% | 41.93% | +78.80% |
Dividends
ONDS vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison
ONDS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.31% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
ONDS Ondas Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ONDS vs. KEN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ondas Holdings Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ONDS and KEN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONDS has higher volatility (44.08%) compared to KEN (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONDS dropped -98.28% vs KEN's -69.20%.
ONDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONDS and KEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer