OND vs. QQQ
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 13.96%/yr vs 26.05%/yr for QQQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
OND vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return.
OND
- 1D
- -2.16%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- -18.87%
- 6M
- -19.28%
- 1Y
- -17.46%
- 3Y*
- 13.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
OND vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -18.87% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -15.04% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and QQQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between OND and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
OND vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OND
QQQ
Communication Services
OND
QQQ
Industrials
OND
QQQ
Real Estate
OND
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
OND
QQQ
Basic Materials
OND
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
QQQ
Energy
OND
-
QQQ
Financial Services
OND
-
QQQ
Healthcare
OND
-
QQQ
Utilities
OND
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
QQQ
OND vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.35 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 2.93 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | 10.86 | -11.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OND vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -82.97% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -11.96% | -21.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -22.77% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.63% | -4.25% | -27.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -32.73% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.06% | 3.22% | +15.84% |
Volatility
OND vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 6.52%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 9.17% | -2.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.83% | 14.57% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.91% | 17.96% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 22.69% | +4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 22.42% | +4.68% |
OND vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and QQQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to OND (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 26.05% vs 13.96% for OND. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 26.05% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer