OND vs. QQQ
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 17.30%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for QQQ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
OND vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -12.34% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.62% return.
OND
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- -12.34%
- 6M
- -15.06%
- 1Y
- -6.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- 21.62%
- 6M
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
OND vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -12.34% | 26.72% | 32.00% | 27.03% | -41.93% | -14.36% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.62% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 4.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and QQQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.75 |
The correlation between OND and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
OND vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OND
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OND
QQQ
Communication Services
OND
QQQ
Industrials
OND
QQQ
Real Estate
OND
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
OND
QQQ
Basic Materials
OND
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
OND
-
QQQ
Energy
OND
-
QQQ
Financial Services
OND
-
QQQ
Healthcare
OND
-
QQQ
Utilities
OND
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
OND
QQQ
OND vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | 2.73 | -3.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | 3.55 | -3.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.47 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 3.71 | -3.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 14.30 | -14.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 | 2.73 | -3.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.41 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
OND vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -82.97% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | -11.96% | -21.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | -22.77% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.13% | 0.00% | -26.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -32.79% | +2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.73% | 3.11% | +14.62% |
Volatility
OND vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.48%. This indicates that OND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 4.48% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 12.11% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 15.95% | +4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 22.39% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 22.30% | +4.84% |
OND vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and QQQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OND has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to QQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 3-year performance, QQQ leads with 28.89% vs 17.30% for OND. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 17.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OND and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer