OND vs. GXPC
OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - OND tracks the FactSet On-Demand Index while GXPC tracks the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPC.
Performance
OND vs. GXPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -14.28% return, which is significantly lower than GXPC's 3.83% return.
OND
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- -14.28%
- 6M
- -16.72%
- 1Y
- -8.96%
- 3Y*
- 16.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OND vs. GXPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | -14.28% | -6.86% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 3.83% | 19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between OND and GXPC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OND vs. GXPC — Risk / Return Rank
OND
GXPC
OND vs. GXPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OND | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OND | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 1.43 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
OND vs. GXPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than GXPC's maximum drawdown of -16.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and GXPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OND | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.02% | -16.59% | -42.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.76% | -7.11% | -20.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -3.05% | -27.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.81% | — | — |
Volatility
OND vs. GXPC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OND | GXPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 19.79% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 19.79% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 19.79% | +7.36% |
OND vs. GXPC - Expense Ratio Comparison
OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPC's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
OND vs. GXPC - Dividend Comparison
OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.12% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OND and GXPC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.
GXPC has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for OND.
OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.15% for GXPC.
Find the right allocation for OND and GXPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer