GXPC vs. GOLS
GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GXPC is passively managed, while GOLS is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.
Performance
GXPC vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GXPC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -8.61%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOLS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | -0.80% |
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 2.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPC and GOLS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPC vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPC vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and GOLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPC | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -7.85% | -8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -3.83% | -7.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -1.96% | -1.36% |
Volatility
GXPC vs. GOLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPC | GOLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.44% | 13.74% | +6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 13.74% | +6.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 13.74% | +6.70% |
GXPC vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPC vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison
GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPC and GOLS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.
GXPC has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.90% for GOLS.
Find the right allocation for GXPC and GOLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer