GXPC vs. GOLS

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and GOLS (Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF) are both Communications Equities funds. GXPC is passively managed, while GOLS is actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for GOLS.

Performance

GXPC vs. GOLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GXPC

• 1D: 4.11%
• 1M: -2.08%
• 6M: -5.32%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 1Y: 18.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.60%

GOLS

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: -1.57%
• 6M: 6.08%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF	$118.16K	$131.19K	$97.70K
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	$9.39M	$10.86M	$5.78M

GXPC vs. GOLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	-0.23%
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPC and GOLS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026	0.45

Return for Risk

GXPC vs. GOLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GXPC

GXPC Risk / Return Rank: 31
GXPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GXPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GXPC Omega Ratio Rank: 31
GXPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GXPC Martin Ratio Rank: 32

GOLS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GXPC vs. GOLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF (GOLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXPC	GOLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	—	—

Drawdowns

GXPC vs. GOLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, which is greater than GOLS's maximum drawdown of -7.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and GOLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPC	GOLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-7.85%	-8.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.74%	-1.71%	-9.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-1.98%	-2.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPC	GOLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.20%	13.82%	+8.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	13.82%	+8.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	13.82%	+8.13%

GXPC vs. GOLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than GOLS's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPC vs. GOLS - Dividend Comparison

GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while GOLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GOLS Gabelli Opportunities in Live and Sports ETF	0.00%	0.00%
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	0.32%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPC and GOLS in my portfolio?

GXPC and GOLS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPC or GOLS?

On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPC or GOLS?

GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for GOLS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPC or GOLS?

GXPC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for GOLS.

What is the main difference between GXPC and GOLS?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.90% for GOLS.