GXPC vs. IYZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) are both Communications Equities funds - GXPC tracks the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index while IYZ tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYZ.

Performance

GXPC vs. IYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPC achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than IYZ's 24.80% return.

GXPC

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -8.61%
• YTD: -0.80%
• 6M: -0.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IYZ

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -5.71%
• YTD: 24.80%
• 6M: 24.25%
• 1Y: 49.71%
• 3Y*: 28.60%
• 5Y*: 7.05%
• 10Y*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPC vs. IYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	-0.80%	19.31%
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF	24.80%	13.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPC and IYZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

GXPC vs. IYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IYZ

IYZ Risk / Return Rank: 87
IYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
IYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
IYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
IYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPC vs. IYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GXPC	IYZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.67	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.55	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.47	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	20.02	—

Drawdowns

GXPC vs. IYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum IYZ drawdown of -77.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and IYZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GXPC	IYZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-77.11%	+60.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.25%	-8.27%	-2.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	-40.07%	+36.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GXPC	IYZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.44%	18.76%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.44%	18.90%	+1.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	19.28%	+1.16%

GXPC vs. IYZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IYZ's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

GXPC vs. IYZ - Dividend Comparison

GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IYZ's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF	0.12%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF	1.67%	2.04%	1.94%	2.27%	2.55%	2.51%	2.60%	2.36%	2.15%	3.54%	2.27%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GXPC and IYZ in my portfolio?

GXPC and IYZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GXPC or IYZ?

On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GXPC or IYZ?

GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GXPC or IYZ?

IYZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.12% for GXPC.

What is the main difference between GXPC and IYZ?

GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.42% for IYZ.