OND vs. ESPO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

OND (ProShares On-Demand ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OND is a Communications Equities fund tracking the FactSet On-Demand Index, while ESPO is a Gaming fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OND returned 13.96%/yr vs 17.97%/yr for ESPO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OND charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.

Performance

OND vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -18.87% return, which is significantly lower than ESPO's -16.33% return.

OND

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -5.24%
• YTD: -18.87%
• 6M: -19.28%
• 1Y: -17.46%
• 3Y*: 13.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESPO

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -2.71%
• YTD: -16.33%
• 6M: -16.76%
• 1Y: -16.63%
• 3Y*: 17.97%
• 5Y*: 5.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OND vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	-18.87%	26.72%	32.00%	27.03%	-41.93%	-15.04%
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF	-16.33%	25.79%	47.61%	33.64%	-34.71%	-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between OND and ESPO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.86

The correlation between OND and ESPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

OND vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OND	ESPO
Technology	25.9%	55.8%
Communication Services	23.8%	29.7%
Industrials	3.6%	-
Real Estate	3.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	14.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OND vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OND

OND Risk / Return Rank: 3
OND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
OND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
OND Omega Ratio Rank: 3
OND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
OND Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ESPO

ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 3
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OND vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OND	ESPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	-0.90	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.10	-1.17	+0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	0.86	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	-0.59	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	-1.01	+0.09

OND vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OND Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OND and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OND vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and ESPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	OND	ESPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.02%	-50.99%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.80%	-28.25%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.80%	-28.25%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.63%	-28.25%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.29%	-15.10%	-15.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.06%	16.49%	+2.57%

Volatility

OND vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.23%. This indicates that OND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OND	ESPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.52%	4.23%	+2.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.83%	14.64%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.91%	18.65%	+2.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.10%	25.09%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.10%	25.68%	+1.42%

OND vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

OND vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF	1.49%	1.24%	0.44%	0.96%	0.91%	3.36%	0.12%	0.22%	0.04%
OND ProShares On-Demand ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.78%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OND and ESPO in my portfolio?

OND and ESPO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OND or ESPO?

OND has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to ESPO (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

Which ETF is better, OND or ESPO?

On 3-year performance, ESPO leads with 17.97% vs 13.96% for OND. On fees, ESPO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OND or ESPO?

Over the 3-year period, ESPO has performed better with a 17.97% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OND or ESPO?

ESPO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for OND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OND or ESPO?

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.00% for OND.

What is the main difference between OND and ESPO?

OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while ESPO is Gaming. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.55% for ESPO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.84 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.