PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OND vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OND vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OND achieves a -14.28% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -52.92% return.


OND

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.68%
YTD
-14.28%
6M
-16.72%
1Y
-8.96%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-5.58%
1M
-34.84%
YTD
-52.92%
6M
-59.11%
1Y
-73.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OND vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
-14.28%26.72%17.37%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-52.92%-37.07%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between OND and BITU is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024

0.38

OND vs. BITU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OND
BITU

Technology

24.8%

-

Communication Services

23.5%

-

Industrials

4.2%

-

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

OND
24.8%
BITU

-

Communication Services

OND
23.5%
BITU

-

Industrials

OND
4.2%
BITU

-

Real Estate

OND
3.3%
BITU

-

Consumer Cyclical

OND
2.0%
BITU

-

Basic Materials

OND

-

BITU

-

Consumer Defensive

OND

-

BITU

-

Energy

OND

-

BITU

-

Financial Services

OND

-

BITU
4.2%

Healthcare

OND

-

BITU

-

Utilities

OND

-

BITU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OND vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OND
OND Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
OND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OND Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
OND Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
OND Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
OND Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OND vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ONDBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.44

-0.84

+0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.48

-1.44

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.84

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.93

+0.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.50

-1.47

+0.96

OND vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OND Sharpe Ratio is -0.44, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OND and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ONDBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.44

-0.84

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

-0.35

+0.27

Drawdowns

OND vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OND drawdown since its inception was -59.02%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -78.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OND and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONDBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.02%

-78.94%

+19.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.80%

-78.94%

+45.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.76%

-78.94%

+51.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.32%

-34.49%

+4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.81%

49.84%

-32.03%

Volatility

OND vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares On-Demand ETF (OND) is 5.40%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that OND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONDBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

18.99%

-13.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.38%

69.41%

-54.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.57%

87.00%

-66.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.15%

97.45%

-70.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.15%

97.45%

-70.30%

OND vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

OND has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

OND vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

OND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 83.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
83.36%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OND
ProShares On-Demand ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.78%0.00%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


OND and BITU have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to OND (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OND dropped -59.02% vs BITU's -78.94%.

On 1-year performance, OND leads with -8.96% vs -73.07% for BITU. On fees, OND is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, OND has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OND has performed better with a -8.96% return vs -73.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OND is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 83.36%, compared with 0.00% for OND.

OND is categorized as Communications Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. OND tracks FactSet On-Demand Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for OND and 0.95% for BITU.

OND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OND and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer