OMFS vs. QVMS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

OMFS (Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) and QVMS (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OMFS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while QVMS is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OMFS returned 16.15%/yr vs 16.95%/yr for QVMS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OMFS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QVMS.

Performance

OMFS vs. QVMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMFS achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly lower than QVMS's 20.78% return.

OMFS

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 4.50%
• YTD: 19.07%
• 6M: 15.99%
• 1Y: 36.23%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: —

QVMS

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 5.14%
• YTD: 20.78%
• 6M: 17.79%
• 1Y: 37.18%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMFS vs. QVMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	19.07%	13.34%	3.98%	15.12%	-17.29%	2.41%
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	20.78%	5.56%	9.50%	16.89%	-14.61%	4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between OMFS and QVMS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.94

The correlation between OMFS and QVMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

OMFS vs. QVMS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OMFS	QVMS
Financial Services	24.3%	18.0%
Technology	15.3%	16.7%
Industrials	14.9%	16.3%
Healthcare	13.7%	11.1%
Real Estate	11.5%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	13.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	2.8%
Energy	3.4%	5.6%
Basic Materials	2.7%	5.0%
Utilities	1.1%	2.1%
Communication Services	0.9%	1.9%

Return for Risk

OMFS vs. QVMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMFS

OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 67
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 57
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

QVMS

QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 71
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMFS vs. QVMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OMFS	QVMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.10	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	3.04	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	4.25	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.35	14.44	-1.08

OMFS vs. QVMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the QVMS Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMFS and QVMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OMFS vs. QVMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMFS drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, which is greater than QVMS's maximum drawdown of -28.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMFS and QVMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	OMFS	QVMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-28.05%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-8.78%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.35%	-28.05%	+5.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.43%	-9.01%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.58%	+0.14%

Volatility

OMFS vs. QVMS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) have volatilities of 5.00% and 5.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OMFS	QVMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	5.02%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.70%	12.43%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.00%	17.86%	+0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.46%	21.23%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.28%	21.23%	+3.05%

OMFS vs. QVMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OMFS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than QVMS's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

OMFS vs. QVMS - Dividend Comparison

OMFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than QVMS's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OMFS Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	1.23%	0.80%	1.87%	1.27%	1.84%	0.66%	1.07%	1.29%	1.50%	0.34%
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.37%	1.10%	1.53%	1.51%	1.58%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OMFS and QVMS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, OMFS and QVMS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OMFS or QVMS?

QVMS has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to OMFS (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMFS dropped -42.50% vs QVMS's -28.05%.

Which ETF is better, OMFS or QVMS?

On 3-year performance, QVMS leads with 16.95% vs 16.15% for OMFS. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OMFS or QVMS?

Over the 3-year period, QVMS has performed better with a 16.95% return vs 16.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OMFS or QVMS?

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for OMFS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OMFS or QVMS?

QVMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.23% for OMFS.

What is the main difference between OMFS and QVMS?

OMFS is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while QVMS is Multi-factor. OMFS tracks Russell 2000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index, while QVMS tracks S&P Small Cap 600. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for OMFS and 0.15% for QVMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.