OMF vs. TRIN
OMF (OneMain Holdings, Inc.) and TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — OMF in Credit Services, TRIN in Asset Management. Over the past 5 years, OMF returned 10.72%/yr vs 21.17%/yr for TRIN. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMF vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMF achieves a -4.17% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 37.03% return.
OMF
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- -4.17%
- 6M
- -5.66%
- 1Y
- 18.48%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 19.71%
TRIN
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 12.80%
- YTD
- 37.03%
- 6M
- 37.44%
- 1Y
- 55.25%
- 3Y*
- 29.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.17%
- 10Y*
- —
OMF vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -4.17% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.25% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 37.03% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 36.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMF and TRIN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between OMF and TRIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMF:
$7.31B
TRIN:
$1.48B
OMF:
$6.73
TRIN:
$1.99
OMF:
9.27
TRIN:
8.91
OMF:
1.49
TRIN:
4.97
OMF:
2.17
TRIN:
1.27
OMF:
$4.94B
TRIN:
$276.05M
OMF:
$2.20B
TRIN:
$219.75M
OMF:
$943.00M
TRIN:
$195.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMF vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank
OMF
TRIN
OMF vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMF | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.44 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 3.70 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 9.32 | -7.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMF vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMF drawdown since its inception was -68.66%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMF and TRIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMF | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.66% | -43.12% | -25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.68% | -14.99% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.94% | -15.58% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.93% | -43.12% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | 0.00% | -9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.25% | -8.84% | -15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.57% | 5.94% | +7.63% |
Volatility
OMF vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison
OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) have volatilities of 8.55% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMF | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.55% | 8.33% | +0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.59% | 16.90% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.08% | 21.27% | +7.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.59% | 26.81% | +8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 27.03% | +18.83% |
Dividends
OMF vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison
OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than TRIN's 19.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 6.72% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 19.93% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
OMF vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OneMain Holdings, Inc. and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
OMF and TRIN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMF has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to TRIN (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMF dropped -68.66% vs TRIN's -43.12%.
TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMF and TRIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer