TRIN vs. ARCC
TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, TRIN returned 19.14%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRIN vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 24.59% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -3.67% return.
TRIN
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 24.59%
- 6M
- 29.76%
- 1Y
- 39.88%
- 3Y*
- 28.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- —
ARCC
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -3.67%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- -5.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
TRIN vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 24.59% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 27.12% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -3.67% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 32.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIN and ARCC is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between TRIN and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRIN:
$1.45B
ARCC:
$13.62B
TRIN:
$2.07
ARCC:
$1.63
TRIN:
8.36
ARCC:
11.63
TRIN:
4.67
ARCC:
5.08
TRIN:
1.24
ARCC:
0.97
TRIN:
$276.05M
ARCC:
$2.63B
TRIN:
$219.75M
ARCC:
$1.86B
TRIN:
$195.35M
ARCC:
$2.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIN vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
TRIN
ARCC
TRIN vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIN | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | -0.28 | +2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | -0.27 | +3.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 0.97 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | -0.28 | +2.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.55 | -0.53 | +7.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIN | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | -0.28 | +2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.45 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.38 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
TRIN vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIN | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -79.36% | +36.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -19.35% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -19.35% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | -21.76% | -21.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -12.32% | +12.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.95% | -9.10% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 10.45% | -4.50% |
Volatility
TRIN vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.66%. This indicates that TRIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIN | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 3.66% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.36% | 14.64% | +0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 18.34% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 19.95% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 25.58% | +1.23% |
Dividends
TRIN vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than ARCC's 10.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.12% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 13.77% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRIN vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Capital Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRIN vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
TRIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.05M and revenue of 83.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.3%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
TRIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 61.68M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.0%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
TRIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a net income of 45.52M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIN and ARCC have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRIN has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to ARCC (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRIN and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer