TRIN vs. PNNT
TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) and PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, TRIN returned 20.59%/yr vs -0.88%/yr for PNNT. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRIN vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIN achieves a 30.54% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -35.79% return.
TRIN
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 30.54%
- 6M
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 49.56%
- 3Y*
- 28.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.59%
- 10Y*
- —
PNNT
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- -35.79%
- 6M
- -33.79%
- 1Y
- -38.27%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
TRIN vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 30.54% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 36.20% |
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | -35.79% | -2.96% | 16.56% | 37.25% | -8.90% | 40.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIN and PNNT is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between TRIN and PNNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.54 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TRIN:
$2.07
PNNT:
$302.41
TRIN:
8.17
PNNT:
0.01
TRIN:
4.56
PNNT:
1.97
TRIN:
$276.05M
PNNT:
$85.01M
TRIN:
$219.75M
PNNT:
$24.12M
TRIN:
$195.35M
PNNT:
$16.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRIN vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank
TRIN
PNNT
TRIN vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRIN | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.76 | +0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | -0.82 | +4.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | -1.77 | +10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRIN vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIN drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIN and PNNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIN | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -82.16% | +39.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.99% | -47.09% | +32.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -47.09% | +31.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.12% | -47.09% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -69.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -45.35% | +45.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -15.33% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 21.67% | -15.72% |
Volatility
TRIN vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) is 7.92%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that TRIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRIN | PNNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 10.55% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 24.47% | -7.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.07% | 27.87% | -6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.75% | 23.70% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 32.85% | -5.83% |
Dividends
TRIN vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison
TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.93%, less than PNNT's 27.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation | 27.83% | 16.11% | 12.85% | 11.65% | 10.43% | 6.93% | 11.71% | 11.03% | 11.30% | 10.42% | 14.62% | 18.12% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 20.93% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TRIN vs. PNNT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trinity Capital Inc. and PennantPark Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRIN and PNNT have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PNNT has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to TRIN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIN dropped -43.12% vs PNNT's -82.16%.
TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRIN and PNNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer