OMAB vs. WDS
OMAB (Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.) and WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) are both stocks. OMAB operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, OMAB returned 13.30%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for WDS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
OMAB vs. WDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMAB achieves a -3.71% return, which is significantly lower than WDS's 52.08% return. Over the past 10 years, OMAB has outperformed WDS with an annualized return of 13.30%, while WDS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
OMAB
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
OMAB vs. WDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMAB Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. | -3.71% | 66.22% | -13.57% | 43.53% | 30.18% | 7.98% | -13.78% | 62.40% | -4.90% | 20.53% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMAB and WDS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.28 |
The correlation between OMAB and WDS shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
OMAB:
$4.91B
WDS:
$44.17B
OMAB:
MX$109.59
WDS:
$3.29
OMAB:
16.01
WDS:
7.02
OMAB:
0.88
WDS:
0.24
OMAB:
5.23
WDS:
1.69
OMAB:
6.78
WDS:
1.23
OMAB:
MX$16.21B
WDS:
$26.15B
OMAB:
MX$12.07B
WDS:
$9.87B
OMAB:
MX$9.83B
WDS:
$17.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMAB vs. WDS — Risk / Return Rank
OMAB
WDS
OMAB vs. WDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OMAB | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.32 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 3.40 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | 7.88 | -7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OMAB vs. WDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMAB drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, roughly equal to the maximum WDS drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAB and WDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMAB | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -77.06% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.87% | -17.16% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.78% | -48.77% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.78% | -48.77% | +6.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.88% | -66.16% | -2.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.41% | -10.20% | -12.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -39.55% | +16.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | 7.40% | +4.42% |
Volatility
OMAB vs. WDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. (OMAB) is 8.11%, while Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that OMAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMAB | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 10.13% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.71% | 24.23% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.68% | 30.62% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.78% | 33.40% | +2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.28% | 33.78% | +4.50% |
Dividends
OMAB vs. WDS - Dividend Comparison
OMAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than WDS's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMAB Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. | 5.34% | 4.52% | 6.97% | 4.80% | 10.87% | 3.55% | 0.00% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 0.40% | 3.11% | 3.89% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
OMAB vs. WDS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OMAB vs. WDS - Profitability Comparison
OMAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 3.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.2%.
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
OMAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. reported an operating income of 2.08B and revenue of 3.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
OMAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V. reported a net income of 1.23B and revenue of 3.82B, resulting in a net margin of 32.3%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OMAB and WDS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDS has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to OMAB (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAB dropped -77.75% vs WDS's -77.06%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMAB and WDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer