OLN vs. LAC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

OLN (Olin Corporation) and LAC (Lithium Americas Corp.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — OLN in Specialty Chemicals, LAC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining. Over the past year, OLN returned 27.48% vs 71.70% for LAC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

OLN vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olin Corporation (OLN) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OLN achieves a 22.46% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's 4.36% return.

OLN

• 1D: 3.84%
• 1M: -6.16%
• YTD: 22.46%
• 6M: 15.01%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: -19.68%
• 5Y*: -10.59%
• 10Y*: 3.32%

LAC

• 1D: 3.17%
• 1M: -9.18%
• YTD: 4.36%
• 6M: -11.13%
• 1Y: 71.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OLN vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OLN Olin Corporation	22.46%	-36.15%	-36.29%	8.44%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	4.36%	46.80%	-53.59%	-27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between OLN and LAC is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.34

The correlation between OLN and LAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap OLN : $2.86B LAC : $1.61B
EPS OLN : -$1.11 LAC : -$0.28
PB Ratio OLN : 1.65 LAC : 1.19
Total Revenue (TTM) OLN : $6.72B LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) OLN : $352.80M LAC : -$580.22K
EBITDA (TTM) OLN : $374.70M LAC : -$52.10M

Return for Risk

OLN vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OLN

OLN Risk / Return Rank: 57
OLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OLN Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
OLN Martin Ratio Rank: 60

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 69
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OLN vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olin Corporation (OLN) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OLN	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	0.56	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.21	-1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.25	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	1.16	-0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	1.77	-0.03

OLN vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is comparable to the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OLN and LAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OLN vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OLN drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, smaller than the maximum LAC drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLN and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	OLN	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.80%	-81.83%	+8.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.45%	-63.08%	+31.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.94%	-61.18%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.97%	-63.13%	+38.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.58%	41.47%	-27.89%

Volatility

OLN vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Olin Corporation (OLN) is 9.59%, while Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) has a volatility of 22.78%. This indicates that OLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OLN	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	22.78%	-13.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.93%	53.55%	-14.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.61%	132.17%	-76.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.90%	101.55%	-56.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.12%	101.55%	-54.43%

Dividends

OLN vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

OLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, while LAC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
OLN Olin Corporation	3.18%	3.84%	2.37%	1.48%	1.51%	1.39%	3.26%	4.64%	3.98%	2.25%	3.12%	4.63%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OLN and LAC in my portfolio?

OLN and LAC have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OLN or LAC?

LAC has higher volatility (22.78%) compared to OLN (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLN dropped -73.80% vs LAC's -81.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.