OLN vs. CC
OLN (Olin Corporation) and CC (The Chemours Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Chemicals industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, OLN returned 1.74%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for CC. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
OLN vs. CC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OLN achieves a -9.80% return, which is significantly lower than CC's 42.10% return. Over the past 10 years, OLN has underperformed CC with an annualized return of 1.74%, while CC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.
OLN
- 1D
- -16.51%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- 6M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -9.80%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- -29.87%
- 5Y*
- -15.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.56%
CC
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -12.62%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 42.10%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- -20.54%
- 5Y*
- -9.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.12M | $40.07M | $57.08M | |
| $75.91M | $70.47M | $68.35M |
OLN vs. CC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OLN Olin Corporation | -9.80% | -36.15% | -36.29% | 3.46% | -6.63% | 138.55% | 50.81% | -10.77% | -41.88% | 42.51% |
CC The Chemours Company | 42.10% | -27.57% | -44.01% | 6.53% | -5.99% | 39.85% | 45.61% | -32.54% | -42.45% | 127.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between OLN and CC is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015 | 0.61 |
The correlation between OLN and CC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
OLN:
$2.11B
CC:
$2.50B
OLN:
-$1.22
CC:
-$4.10
OLN:
0.32
CC:
0.29
OLN:
$6.70B
CC:
$5.82B
OLN:
$214.70M
CC:
$878.00M
OLN:
$74.60M
CC:
$66.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OLN vs. CC — Risk / Return Rank
OLN
CC
OLN vs. CC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olin Corporation (OLN) and The Chemours Company (CC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OLN | CC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.03 | -1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 2.04 | -1.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OLN vs. CC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OLN drawdown since its inception was -73.80%, smaller than the maximum CC drawdown of -86.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OLN and CC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OLN | CC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.80% | -86.15% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.15% | -40.77% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.26% | -72.56% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.87% | -76.42% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.80% | -86.15% | +12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.75% | -60.06% | -9.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.10% | -41.13% | +16.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.48% | 20.51% | -4.03% |
Volatility
OLN vs. CC - Volatility Comparison
Olin Corporation (OLN) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to The Chemours Company (CC) at 15.48%. This indicates that OLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OLN | CC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.77% | 15.48% | +7.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 48.96% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.79% | 63.76% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 56.07% | -10.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.03% | 56.64% | -9.61% |
Dividends
OLN vs. CC - Dividend Comparison
OLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than CC's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CC The Chemours Company | 2.11% | 4.35% | 5.92% | 3.17% | 3.27% | 2.98% | 4.03% | 5.53% | 2.98% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 10.82% |
OLN Olin Corporation | 4.32% | 3.84% | 2.37% | 1.48% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 3.26% | 4.64% | 3.98% | 2.25% | 3.12% | 4.63% |
Financials
OLN vs. CC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Olin Corporation and The Chemours Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OLN vs. CC - Profitability Comparison
OLN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Olin Corporation reported a gross profit of -79.70M and revenue of 1.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -4.6%.
CC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
OLN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Olin Corporation reported an operating income of 28.20M and revenue of 1.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.
CC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported an operating income of 39.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
OLN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Olin Corporation reported a net income of -13.30M and revenue of 1.74B, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
CC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Chemours Company reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
OLN and CC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OLN has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to CC (15.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OLN dropped -73.80% vs CC's -86.15%.
CC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OLN and CC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer