OILU vs. BBSB

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

OILU (MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN) and BBSB (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OILU is a Leveraged Commodities fund managed by BMO, while BBSB is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Over the past 3 years, OILU returned 11.50%/yr vs 4.15%/yr for BBSB. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. OILU charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBSB.

Performance

OILU vs. BBSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OILU achieves a 96.66% return, which is significantly higher than BBSB's 0.55% return.

OILU

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: 96.66%
• 6M: 75.27%
• 1Y: 128.74%
• 3Y*: 11.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBSB

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.55%
• 6M: 0.88%
• 1Y: 3.32%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OILU vs. BBSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	96.66%	-16.50%	-21.65%	-16.88%
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	0.55%	5.12%	4.00%	2.56%

Correlation

The correlation between OILU and BBSB is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2023	-0.16

OILU vs. BBSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OILU	BBSB
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	99.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OILU vs. BBSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OILU

OILU Risk / Return Rank: 59
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 57

BBSB

BBSB Risk / Return Rank: 84
BBSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BBSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
BBSB Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BBSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BBSB Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OILU vs. BBSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OILU	BBSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.64	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	4.47	-2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.54	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	3.89	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.65	16.07	-6.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OILU vs. BBSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OILU Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the BBSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OILU and BBSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OILU	BBSB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.64	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	2.36	-2.20

Drawdowns

OILU vs. BBSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OILU drawdown since its inception was -81.00%, which is greater than BBSB's maximum drawdown of -1.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OILU and BBSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	OILU	BBSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.00%	-1.57%	-79.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.51%	-0.86%	-32.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.09%	-0.96%	-68.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.11%	-0.18%	-46.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.59%	-0.31%	-50.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.39%	0.21%	+13.18%

Volatility

OILU vs. BBSB - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a higher volatility of 25.13% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) at 0.36%. This indicates that OILU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OILU	BBSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.13%	0.36%	+24.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.75%	0.85%	+48.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.13%	1.27%	+60.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.12%	1.66%	+79.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.12%	1.66%	+79.46%

OILU vs. BBSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OILU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSB's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

OILU vs. BBSB - Dividend Comparison

OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BBSB JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF	3.81%	3.69%	4.84%	3.50%
OILU MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OILU and BBSB in my portfolio?

OILU and BBSB have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OILU or BBSB?

OILU has higher volatility (25.13%) compared to BBSB (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OILU dropped -81.00% vs BBSB's -1.57%.

Which ETF is better, OILU or BBSB?

On 3-year performance, OILU leads with 11.50% vs 4.15% for BBSB. On fees, BBSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BBSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OILU or BBSB?

Over the 3-year period, OILU has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OILU or BBSB?

BBSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OILU or BBSB?

BBSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.

What is the main difference between OILU and BBSB?

OILU is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while BBSB is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: BMO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OILU and 0.04% for BBSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.