BBSB vs. SCHO
Compare and contrast key facts about Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO).
BBSB and SCHO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (1-3 Y). It was launched on Apr 19, 2023. SCHO is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury (1-3 Y) (Inception 4/30/1996). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both BBSB and SCHO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSB or SCHO.
Key characteristics
| BBSB | SCHO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.14% | 4.14% |
| 1Y Return | 6.84% | 6.87% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.67 | 3.52 |
| Daily Std Dev | 1.86% | 1.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.57% | -5.69% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBSB and SCHO is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BBSB vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BBSB at 4.14% and SCHO at 4.14%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSB vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSB vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BBSB vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison
BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than SCHO's 4.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 4.87% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHO Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.21% | 3.76% | 1.34% | 0.41% | 1.27% | 2.26% | 1.78% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 0.68% | 0.47% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
BBSB vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSB drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum SCHO drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSB and SCHO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BBSB vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) is 0.43%, while Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a volatility of 0.46%. This indicates that BBSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.