Correlation
The correlation between BBSB and MUST is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
BBSB vs. MUST
Compare and contrast key facts about Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST).
BBSB and MUST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BBSB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Treasury Bond (1-3 Y). It was launched on Apr 19, 2023. MUST is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2018. Both BBSB and MUST are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BBSB or MUST.
Performance
BBSB vs. MUST - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BBSB:
3.53
MUST:
0.24
BBSB:
5.61
MUST:
0.30
BBSB:
1.78
MUST:
1.04
BBSB:
5.99
MUST:
0.20
BBSB:
16.00
MUST:
0.76
BBSB:
0.36%
MUST:
1.73%
BBSB:
1.65%
MUST:
6.90%
BBSB:
-1.57%
MUST:
-13.83%
BBSB:
-0.33%
MUST:
-4.07%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBSB achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than MUST's -0.68% return.
BBSB
2.11%
-0.21%
2.47%
5.80%
N/A
N/A
N/A
MUST
-0.68%
-0.08%
-2.33%
1.67%
1.82%
0.91%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BBSB vs. MUST - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBSB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MUST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BBSB vs. MUST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BBSB
MUST
BBSB vs. MUST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BBSB vs. MUST - Dividend Comparison
BBSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than MUST's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBSB Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF | 4.17% | 4.84% | 3.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 3.28% | 3.13% | 2.50% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 2.33% | 2.47% | 0.55% |
Drawdowns
BBSB vs. MUST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBSB drawdown since its inception was -1.57%, smaller than the maximum MUST drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBSB and MUST.
Loading data...
Volatility
BBSB vs. MUST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Jpmorgan Betabuilders U.S. Treasury Bond 1-3 Year ETF (BBSB) is 0.51%, while Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that BBSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...