PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. ILCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 16.71%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively lower 15.00% annualized return.


OEF

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.34%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.71%

ILCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
5.29%
YTD
11.12%
6M
11.10%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.45%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.51%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%21.82%
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
11.12%17.70%24.96%26.91%-19.48%24.07%19.40%32.68%-8.51%22.09%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and ILCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004

0.94

The correlation between OEF and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

OEF vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
ILCB

Technology

41.0%
35.5%

Communication Services

14.5%
11.4%

Financial Services

10.7%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.8%

Industrials

5.3%
8.6%

Energy

2.6%
3.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.8%

Technology

OEF
41.0%
ILCB
35.5%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
ILCB
11.4%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
ILCB
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
ILCB
10.1%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
ILCB
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
ILCB
4.8%

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
ILCB
8.6%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
ILCB
3.5%

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
ILCB
2.3%

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
ILCB
1.8%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
ILCB
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCB
ILCB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ILCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFILCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.10

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

14.24

-2.95

OEF vs. ILCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the ILCB Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and ILCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFILCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.35

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.83

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.64

-0.19

Drawdowns

OEF vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and ILCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFILCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-51.53%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-9.09%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-19.05%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-25.47%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

-35.30%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.67%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-6.24%

-5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.97%

+0.65%

Volatility

OEF vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFILCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.88%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

9.10%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

12.02%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

17.13%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

18.16%

+0.28%

OEF vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OEF vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCB
iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%1.11%1.19%1.43%1.65%1.16%1.26%2.25%2.17%1.81%1.97%2.44%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, OEF and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs ILCB's -51.53%.

On 10-year performance, OEF leads with 16.71% vs 15.00% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, OEF has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 15.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.

ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILCB is Large Cap Growth Equities. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.03% for ILCB.

ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and ILCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer