OEF vs. ILCB
OEF (iShares S&P 100 ETF) and ILCB (iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OEF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 100 Index, while ILCB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OEF returned 16.71%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for ILCB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ILCB.
Performance
OEF vs. ILCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than ILCB's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, OEF has outperformed ILCB with an annualized return of 16.71%, while ILCB has yielded a comparatively lower 15.00% annualized return.
OEF
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 5.44%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- 1Y
- 29.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.70%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
ILCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 5.29%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- 1Y
- 28.03%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
OEF vs. ILCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 9.51% | 19.80% | 30.74% | 32.71% | -21.03% | 29.18% | 21.21% | 31.87% | -4.16% | 21.82% |
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 11.12% | 17.70% | 24.96% | 26.91% | -19.48% | 24.07% | 19.40% | 32.68% | -8.51% | 22.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between OEF and ILCB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between OEF and ILCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
OEF vs. ILCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OEF
ILCB
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
OEF
ILCB
Communication Services
OEF
ILCB
Financial Services
OEF
ILCB
Consumer Cyclical
OEF
ILCB
Healthcare
OEF
ILCB
Consumer Defensive
OEF
ILCB
Industrials
OEF
ILCB
Energy
OEF
ILCB
Utilities
OEF
ILCB
Basic Materials
OEF
ILCB
Real Estate
OEF
ILCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OEF vs. ILCB — Risk / Return Rank
OEF
ILCB
OEF vs. ILCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OEF | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.10 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.29 | 14.24 | -2.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OEF | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 2.35 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.79 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.83 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.64 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
OEF vs. ILCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than ILCB's maximum drawdown of -51.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and ILCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OEF | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.11% | -51.53% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -9.09% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -19.05% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.47% | -25.47% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.44% | -35.30% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.94% | -0.67% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.76% | -6.24% | -5.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.97% | +0.65% |
Volatility
OEF vs. ILCB - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF (ILCB) at 2.88%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OEF | ILCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.88% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.10% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 12.02% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 17.13% | +0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.44% | 18.16% | +0.28% |
OEF vs. ILCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
OEF vs. ILCB - Dividend Comparison
OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than ILCB's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCB iShares Morningstar U.S. Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.11% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.65% | 1.16% | 1.26% | 2.25% | 2.17% | 1.81% | 1.97% | 2.44% |
OEF iShares S&P 100 ETF | 0.83% | 0.81% | 1.03% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.09% | 1.81% | 2.07% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, OEF and ILCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to ILCB (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs ILCB's -51.53%.
On 10-year performance, OEF leads with 16.71% vs 15.00% for ILCB. On fees, ILCB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ILCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, OEF has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 15.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for OEF.
ILCB has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.
OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ILCB is Large Cap Growth Equities. OEF tracks S&P 100 Index, while ILCB tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 0.03% for ILCB.
ILCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OEF and ILCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer