PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OEF vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OEF vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OEF achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.


OEF

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.34%
1Y
29.54%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
16.71%

CCOR

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-3.71%
6M
-4.87%
1Y
-5.97%
3Y*
-2.34%
5Y*
-2.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OEF vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
9.51%19.80%30.74%32.71%-21.03%29.18%21.21%31.87%-4.16%12.97%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-3.71%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%9.90%4.07%6.03%4.64%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between OEF and CCOR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.19

The correlation between OEF and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (3 years) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OEF vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OEF
CCOR

Technology

41.0%
16.2%

Communication Services

14.5%
8.7%

Financial Services

10.7%
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.5%
9.4%

Healthcare

8.3%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
6.8%

Industrials

5.3%
9.2%

Energy

2.6%
7.2%

Utilities

0.9%
6.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
5.1%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.8%

Technology

OEF
41.0%
CCOR
16.2%

Communication Services

OEF
14.5%
CCOR
8.7%

Financial Services

OEF
10.7%
CCOR
17.7%

Consumer Cyclical

OEF
10.5%
CCOR
9.4%

Healthcare

OEF
8.3%
CCOR
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

OEF
5.4%
CCOR
6.8%

Industrials

OEF
5.3%
CCOR
9.2%

Energy

OEF
2.6%
CCOR
7.2%

Utilities

OEF
0.9%
CCOR
6.3%

Basic Materials

OEF
0.5%
CCOR
5.1%

Real Estate

OEF
0.3%
CCOR
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OEF vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OEF
OEF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
OEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
OEF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OEF vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OEFCCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.87

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

-0.69

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.29

-1.59

+12.88

OEF vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OEF and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OEFCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

-0.87

+3.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

-0.23

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.11

+0.33

Drawdowns

OEF vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OEF drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OEF and CCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OEFCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-22.99%

-31.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-8.75%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-12.31%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.47%

-22.99%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-20.03%

+19.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.76%

-7.29%

-4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.77%

-1.15%

Volatility

OEF vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that OEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OEFCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

1.78%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

4.96%

+4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

6.93%

+5.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

11.10%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

10.75%

+7.69%

OEF vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

OEF vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

OEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.11%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%0.00%0.00%
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
0.83%0.81%1.03%1.19%1.55%1.06%1.43%1.87%2.09%1.81%2.07%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


OEF and CCOR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OEF has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OEF dropped -54.11% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

On 5-year performance, OEF leads with 15.70% vs -2.56% for CCOR. On fees, OEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OEF has performed better with a 15.70% return vs -2.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.83% for OEF.

OEF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CCOR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for OEF and 1.09% for CCOR.

OEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OEF and CCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer