OCMGX vs. EKWAX
Compare and contrast key facts about OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX).
OCMGX is managed by OCM. It was launched on Feb 3, 1988. EKWAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund | 11.16% | 167.05% | 23.15% | 4.21% | -17.71% | -9.67% | 44.28% | 56.74% | -13.84% | 9.70% |
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 13.31% | 163.65% | 21.28% | 8.83% | -7.75% | -11.00% | 24.40% | 40.35% | -12.83% | 9.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OCMGX achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly lower than EKWAX's 13.31% return. Over the past 10 years, OCMGX has outperformed EKWAX with an annualized return of 20.09%, while EKWAX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.67% annualized return.
OCMGX
- 1D
- 4.36%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 30.86%
- 1Y
- 117.16%
- 3Y*
- 50.49%
- 5Y*
- 25.61%
- 10Y*
- 20.09%
EKWAX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -8.51%
- YTD
- 13.31%
- 6M
- 32.49%
- 1Y
- 123.19%
- 3Y*
- 51.71%
- 5Y*
- 28.94%
- 10Y*
- 18.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OCMGX has a 2.32% expense ratio, which is higher than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OCMGX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank
OCMGX
EKWAX
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OCMGX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.93 | 2.81 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 2.88 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.43 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 4.25 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.42 | 15.68 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OCMGX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 2.81 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.89 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.56 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.34 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between OCMGX and EKWAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison
OCMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than EKWAX's 1.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund | 5.85% | 6.50% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.07% | 0.98% | 6.33% | 26.98% | 7.19% | 19.53% | 0.05% |
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund | 1.05% | 1.19% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 1.34% | 1.11% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OCMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.47%, which is greater than EKWAX's maximum drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMGX and EKWAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OCMGX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.47% | -76.76% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.33% | -29.03% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.55% | -42.79% | -2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.55% | -49.23% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.23% | -15.74% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -32.85% | -8.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 7.87% | -0.33% |
Volatility
OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) is 15.15%, while Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) has a volatility of 16.44%. This indicates that OCMGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKWAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OCMGX | EKWAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 16.44% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.75% | 36.41% | -4.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 44.02% | -4.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 32.80% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.93% | 33.19% | +0.74% |