OCMGX vs. EKWAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

OCMGX (OCM Gold Fund) and EKWAX (Allspring Precious Metals Fund) are both mutual funds - OCMGX is a Gold fund managed by OCM, while EKWAX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Allspring. Over the past 10 years, OCMGX returned 13.39%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for EKWAX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OCMGX charges 2.32%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for EKWAX.

Performance

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OCMGX achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly higher than EKWAX's -9.10% return. Over the past 10 years, OCMGX has outperformed EKWAX with an annualized return of 13.39%, while EKWAX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.51% annualized return.

OCMGX

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: -2.01%
• 6M: -12.95%
• YTD: -5.08%
• 1Y: 57.91%
• 3Y*: 47.00%
• 5Y*: 19.34%
• 10Y*: 13.39%
• ALL TIME*: 3.83%

EKWAX

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -2.85%
• 6M: -16.24%
• YTD: -9.10%
• 1Y: 52.40%
• 3Y*: 42.22%
• 5Y*: 22.63%
• 10Y*: 11.51%
• ALL TIME*: 10.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund	-5.08%	167.05%	23.15%	4.21%	-17.71%	-9.67%	44.28%	56.74%	-13.84%	9.70%
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	-9.10%	163.65%	21.28%	8.83%	-7.75%	-11.00%	24.40%	40.35%	-12.83%	9.66%

Correlation

The correlation between OCMGX and EKWAX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 1998	0.95

The correlation between OCMGX and EKWAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OCMGX vs. EKWAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OCMGX

OCMGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
OCMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
OCMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OCMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
OCMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
OCMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

EKWAX

EKWAX Risk / Return Rank: 35
EKWAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EKWAX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EKWAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
EKWAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OCMGX	EKWAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	1.17	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.61	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.22	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.46	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.07	3.22	+0.85

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OCMGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EKWAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OCMGX and EKWAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OCMGX drawdown since its inception was -84.47%, which is greater than EKWAX's maximum drawdown of -76.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OCMGX and EKWAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	OCMGX	EKWAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.47%	-76.76%	-7.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.56%	-37.42%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.56%	-37.42%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.20%	-42.79%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.55%	-49.23%	+3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.62%	-32.40%	+4.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.10%	-32.76%	-8.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.53%	16.97%	-2.44%

Volatility

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Volatility Comparison

OCM Gold Fund (OCMGX) and Allspring Precious Metals Fund (EKWAX) have volatilities of 11.94% and 12.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OCMGX	EKWAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	12.54%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.45%	38.76%	-3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.19%	46.78%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.06%	34.41%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.01%	33.38%	+0.63%

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OCMGX has a 2.32% expense ratio, which is higher than EKWAX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

OCMGX vs. EKWAX - Dividend Comparison

OCMGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than EKWAX's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EKWAX Allspring Precious Metals Fund	1.31%	1.19%	0.84%	0.00%	2.01%	1.35%	1.45%	0.11%	0.00%	1.34%	1.11%	0.00%
OCMGX OCM Gold Fund	6.85%	6.50%	2.88%	0.00%	0.05%	1.07%	0.98%	6.33%	26.98%	7.19%	19.53%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OCMGX and EKWAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, OCMGX and EKWAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OCMGX or EKWAX?

EKWAX has higher volatility (12.54%) compared to OCMGX (11.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OCMGX dropped -84.47% vs EKWAX's -76.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OCMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.