PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBIL vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBIL vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBIL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.90% return.


OBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.02%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.90%
6M
2.09%
1Y
7.95%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBIL vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
1.17%4.19%4.94%4.69%0.53%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.90%4.13%7.25%4.63%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between OBIL and BUCK is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBIL vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBIL
OBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
OBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
OBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBIL vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBILBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.70

1.54

+2.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.56

6.11

+21.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

150.40

32.31

+118.08

OBIL vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBIL Sharpe Ratio is 7.07, which is higher than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBIL and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBILBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07

2.54

+4.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.38

1.47

+3.91

Drawdowns

OBIL vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBIL and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBILBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-5.43%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.14%

-1.31%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.21%

-5.43%

+5.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.04%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-0.49%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.25%

-0.22%

Volatility

OBIL vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) is 0.10%, while Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) has a volatility of 0.70%. This indicates that OBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBILBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

0.70%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.33%

1.53%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

3.14%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

3.49%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.82%

3.49%

-2.67%

OBIL vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

OBIL vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

OBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than BUCK's 7.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.42%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
3.65%3.83%4.56%4.92%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBIL and BUCK have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BUCK has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to OBIL (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBIL dropped -0.33% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 3-year performance, BUCK leads with 5.27% vs 4.55% for OBIL. On fees, OBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 5.27% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 3.65% for OBIL.

They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for OBIL and 0.35% for BUCK.

OBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.07 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBIL and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer