PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OBIL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OBIL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OBIL achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return.


OBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OBIL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
1.17%4.19%4.94%4.69%0.53%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between OBIL and VOO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OBIL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OBIL
OBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
OBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
OBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
OBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
OBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OBIL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OBILVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+12.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.70

1.43

+2.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

27.56

3.16

+24.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

150.40

14.73

+135.67

OBIL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OBIL Sharpe Ratio is 7.07, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OBIL and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OBILVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.07

2.39

+4.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.38

0.89

+4.49

Drawdowns

OBIL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OBIL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OBILVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-33.99%

+33.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.14%

-8.90%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.21%

-18.69%

+18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.03%

-3.69%

+3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

1.91%

-1.88%

Volatility

OBIL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF (OBIL) is 0.10%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that OBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OBILVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

2.84%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.33%

8.90%

-8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

11.80%

-11.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.82%

16.81%

-15.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.82%

18.01%

-17.19%

OBIL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

OBIL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

OBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OBIL
US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
3.65%3.83%4.56%4.92%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


OBIL and VOO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to OBIL (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OBIL dropped -0.33% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.44% vs 4.55% for OBIL. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, OBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.44% return vs 4.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for OBIL.

OBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

OBIL is categorized as Government Bonds, while VOO is S&P 500. OBIL tracks ICE BofA US 1-Year Treasury Bill Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for OBIL and 0.03% for VOO.

OBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.07 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OBIL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer