OASC vs. ISCB
OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) and ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. OASC is actively managed, while ISCB is passively managed. Over the past year, OASC returned 36.18% vs 29.48% for ISCB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OASC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ISCB.
Performance
OASC vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OASC achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 11.43% return.
OASC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.43%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 36.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.30%
OASC vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 16.43% | 8.91% | 10.35% |
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 11.43% | 12.46% | 10.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between OASC and ISCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between OASC and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
OASC vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OASC
ISCB
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
OASC
ISCB
Financial Services
OASC
ISCB
Healthcare
OASC
ISCB
Consumer Cyclical
OASC
ISCB
Industrials
OASC
ISCB
Basic Materials
OASC
ISCB
Energy
OASC
ISCB
Utilities
OASC
ISCB
Real Estate
OASC
ISCB
Consumer Defensive
OASC
ISCB
Communication Services
OASC
ISCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OASC vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank
OASC
ISCB
OASC vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OASC | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 3.15 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.82 | 11.26 | +4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OASC | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.80 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.38 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
OASC vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OASC drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OASC and ISCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OASC | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.00% | -61.25% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -9.39% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.67% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -9.80% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.63% | -0.34% |
Volatility
OASC vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) at 4.28%. This indicates that OASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OASC | ISCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.28% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 11.43% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.04% | 16.51% | +1.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 21.39% | -0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 22.68% | -1.73% |
OASC vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
OASC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OASC vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison
OASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than ISCB's 1.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.27% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, OASC and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
OASC has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to ISCB (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OASC dropped -27.00% vs ISCB's -61.25%.
On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 36.18% vs 29.48% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 36.18% return vs 29.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for OASC.
ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.46% for OASC.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OASC and 0.04% for ISCB.
OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OASC and ISCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer