PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OASC vs. OACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OASC vs. OACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OASC achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than OACP's 0.22% return.


OASC

1D
1.02%
1M
4.07%
YTD
17.25%
6M
19.23%
1Y
39.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OACP

1D
0.07%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OASC vs. OACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OASC
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
17.25%8.91%10.35%
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
0.22%7.17%1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between OASC and OACP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024

0.27

OASC vs. OACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OASC
OACP

Technology

25.1%

-

Financial Services

23.4%
1.1%

Healthcare

12.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%

-

Industrials

11.3%

-

Basic Materials

5.3%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Communication Services

1.3%

-

Technology

OASC
25.1%
OACP

-

Financial Services

OASC
23.4%
OACP
1.1%

Healthcare

OASC
12.6%
OACP

-

Consumer Cyclical

OASC
11.5%
OACP

-

Industrials

OASC
11.3%
OACP

-

Basic Materials

OASC
5.3%
OACP

-

Energy

OASC
3.6%
OACP

-

Utilities

OASC
2.2%
OACP

-

Real Estate

OASC
2.1%
OACP

-

Consumer Defensive

OASC
1.6%
OACP

-

Communication Services

OASC
1.3%
OACP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OASC vs. OACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OASC
OASC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
OASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
OASC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
OASC Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

OACP
OACP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
OACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
OACP Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
OACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
OACP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OASC vs. OACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OASCOACPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.61

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

2.38

+0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

2.09

+2.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.76

6.14

+10.62

OASC vs. OACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OASC Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the OACP Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OASC and OACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OASCOACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.61

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.30

+0.61

Drawdowns

OASC vs. OACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OASC drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, which is greater than OACP's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OASC and OACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OASCOACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.00%

-11.81%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

-2.60%

-5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.07%

-3.60%

-2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

0.88%

+1.41%

Volatility

OASC vs. OACP - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) at 1.27%. This indicates that OASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OASCOACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

1.27%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

2.59%

+9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

3.55%

+14.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

5.81%

+15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.96%

5.81%

+15.15%

OASC vs. OACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OASC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OACP's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

OASC vs. OACP - Dividend Comparison

OASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than OACP's 4.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
OACP
OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF
4.37%4.46%4.51%3.87%2.34%
OASC
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
0.46%0.53%0.46%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OASC and OACP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OASC has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to OACP (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OASC dropped -27.00% vs OACP's -11.81%.

On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 39.33% vs 5.67% for OACP. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 39.33% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.

OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.46% for OASC.

OASC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OACP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OASC and 0.77% for OACP.

OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OASC and OACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer