OASC vs. OACP
OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) and OACP (OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OASC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while OACP is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Oneascent. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OASC returned 39.33% vs 5.67% for OACP. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OASC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for OACP.
Performance
OASC vs. OACP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OASC achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than OACP's 0.22% return.
OASC
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OACP
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OASC vs. OACP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 17.25% | 8.91% | 10.35% |
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.22% | 7.17% | 1.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between OASC and OACP is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.27 |
OASC vs. OACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OASC
OACP
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
OASC
OACP
-
Financial Services
OASC
OACP
Healthcare
OASC
OACP
-
Consumer Cyclical
OASC
OACP
-
Industrials
OASC
OACP
-
Basic Materials
OASC
OACP
-
Energy
OASC
OACP
-
Utilities
OASC
OACP
-
Real Estate
OASC
OACP
-
Consumer Defensive
OASC
OACP
-
Communication Services
OASC
OACP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OASC vs. OACP — Risk / Return Rank
OASC
OACP
OASC vs. OACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OASC | OACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.61 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.12 | 2.38 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.09 | +2.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 6.14 | +10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OASC | OACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.61 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.30 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
OASC vs. OACP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OASC drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, which is greater than OACP's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OASC and OACP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OASC | OACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.00% | -11.81% | -15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -2.60% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.31% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -3.60% | -2.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 0.88% | +1.41% |
Volatility
OASC vs. OACP - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF (OACP) at 1.27%. This indicates that OASC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OASC | OACP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 1.27% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 2.59% | +9.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 3.55% | +14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 5.81% | +15.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 5.81% | +15.15% |
OASC vs. OACP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OASC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OACP's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
OASC vs. OACP - Dividend Comparison
OASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than OACP's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OACP OneAscent Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.37% | 4.46% | 4.51% | 3.87% | 2.34% |
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OASC and OACP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OASC has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to OACP (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OASC dropped -27.00% vs OACP's -11.81%.
On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 39.33% vs 5.67% for OACP. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OACP has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 39.33% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for OACP.
OACP has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.46% for OASC.
OASC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OACP is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OASC and 0.77% for OACP.
OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OASC and OACP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer