OASC vs. OAIM
OASC (OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF) and OAIM (OneAscent International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OASC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent, while OAIM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Oneascent. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OASC returned 39.33% vs 28.30% for OAIM. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OASC charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OAIM.
Performance
OASC vs. OAIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OASC achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than OAIM's 14.62% return.
OASC
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OAIM
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 6M
- 19.16%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 18.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OASC vs. OAIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 17.25% | 8.91% | 10.35% |
OAIM OneAscent International Equity ETF | 14.62% | 30.12% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between OASC and OAIM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between OASC and OAIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
OASC vs. OAIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OASC
OAIM
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
OASC
OAIM
Financial Services
OASC
OAIM
Healthcare
OASC
OAIM
Consumer Cyclical
OASC
OAIM
Industrials
OASC
OAIM
Basic Materials
OASC
OAIM
Energy
OASC
OAIM
Utilities
OASC
OAIM
Real Estate
OASC
OAIM
Consumer Defensive
OASC
OAIM
Communication Services
OASC
OAIM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OASC vs. OAIM — Risk / Return Rank
OASC
OAIM
OASC vs. OAIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) and OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OASC | OAIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | 1.83 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.12 | 2.52 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.01 | 2.80 | +2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.76 | 10.58 | +6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OASC | OAIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 1.83 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.26 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
OASC vs. OAIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OASC drawdown since its inception was -27.00%, which is greater than OAIM's maximum drawdown of -14.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OASC and OAIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OASC | OAIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.00% | -14.69% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -10.88% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.40% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -2.81% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.88% | -0.59% |
Volatility
OASC vs. OAIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF (OASC) is 5.11%, while OneAscent International Equity ETF (OAIM) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that OASC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OAIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OASC | OAIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 5.67% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 13.29% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 15.58% | +2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 16.87% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 16.87% | +4.09% |
OASC vs. OAIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
OASC has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than OAIM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
OASC vs. OAIM - Dividend Comparison
OASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than OAIM's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAIM OneAscent International Equity ETF | 0.86% | 0.98% | 2.40% | 1.94% | 0.60% |
OASC OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OASC and OAIM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAIM has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to OASC (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OASC dropped -27.00% vs OAIM's -14.69%.
On 1-year performance, OASC leads with 39.33% vs 28.30% for OAIM. On fees, OASC is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, OASC has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OASC has performed better with a 39.33% return vs 28.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OASC is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OAIM.
OAIM has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.46% for OASC.
OASC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OAIM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for OASC and 0.95% for OAIM.
OASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OASC and OAIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer