OALC vs. THLV
OALC (OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF) and THLV (THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. OALC is actively managed, while THLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OALC returned 23.85%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for THLV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OALC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for THLV.
Performance
OALC vs. THLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than THLV's 9.49% return.
OALC
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 16.26%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THLV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OALC vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 15.60% | 20.36% | 19.64% | 22.03% | 1.98% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 9.49% | 10.50% | 9.52% | 5.88% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between OALC and THLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between OALC and THLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OALC vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OALC
THLV
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
OALC
THLV
Financial Services
OALC
THLV
Consumer Cyclical
OALC
THLV
Communication Services
OALC
THLV
Industrials
OALC
THLV
Healthcare
OALC
THLV
Consumer Defensive
OALC
THLV
Utilities
OALC
THLV
Energy
OALC
THLV
Basic Materials
OALC
THLV
Real Estate
OALC
THLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OALC vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank
OALC
THLV
OALC vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OALC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.33 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.93 | 2.76 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.19 | 8.38 | +9.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OALC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | 1.87 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.88 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
OALC vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and THLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OALC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -13.15% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.42% | -6.66% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | -13.15% | -4.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.99% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -3.74% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 2.19% | -0.37% |
Volatility
OALC vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OALC | THLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 3.45% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 7.48% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 9.84% | +3.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 11.73% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 11.73% | +5.55% |
OALC vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
OALC vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison
OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than THLV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF | 0.53% | 0.61% | 0.70% | 0.40% | 0.40% | 0.06% |
THLV THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF | 1.62% | 1.77% | 1.25% | 2.72% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OALC and THLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
THLV has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to OALC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs THLV's -13.15%.
On 3-year performance, OALC leads with 23.85% vs 12.59% for THLV. On fees, OALC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OALC has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OALC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.
THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.53% for OALC.
They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OALC and 0.64% for THLV.
OALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OALC and THLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer