PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OALC vs. THLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OALC vs. THLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly higher than THLV's 9.49% return.


OALC

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.75%
YTD
15.60%
6M
16.26%
1Y
32.95%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
10Y*

THLV

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.27%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.41%
1Y
18.29%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OALC vs. THLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
15.60%20.36%19.64%22.03%1.98%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
9.49%10.50%9.52%5.88%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and THLV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2022

0.76

The correlation between OALC and THLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OALC vs. THLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OALC
THLV

Technology

37.8%
15.7%

Financial Services

14.7%
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
15.7%

Communication Services

8.4%
0.1%

Industrials

7.6%
13.5%

Healthcare

6.4%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
13.7%

Utilities

3.0%
14.7%

Energy

2.5%
17.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%
12.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
14.3%

Technology

OALC
37.8%
THLV
15.7%

Financial Services

OALC
14.7%
THLV
13.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OALC
11.1%
THLV
15.7%

Communication Services

OALC
8.4%
THLV
0.1%

Industrials

OALC
7.6%
THLV
13.5%

Healthcare

OALC
6.4%
THLV
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

OALC
5.3%
THLV
13.7%

Utilities

OALC
3.0%
THLV
14.7%

Energy

OALC
2.5%
THLV
17.5%

Basic Materials

OALC
1.3%
THLV
12.2%

Real Estate

OALC
1.0%
THLV
14.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OALC vs. THLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC
OALC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

THLV
THLV Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
THLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
THLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
THLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
THLV Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. THLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OALCTHLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

2.76

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.19

8.38

+9.81

OALC vs. THLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the THLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and THLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OALCTHLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

1.87

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.88

-0.20

Drawdowns

OALC vs. THLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than THLV's maximum drawdown of -13.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and THLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OALCTHLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-13.15%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-6.66%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-13.15%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-1.99%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.04%

-3.74%

-3.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.19%

-0.37%

Volatility

OALC vs. THLV - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF (THLV) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OALCTHLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.45%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

7.48%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.94%

9.84%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

11.73%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

11.73%

+5.55%

OALC vs. THLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than THLV's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

OALC vs. THLV - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than THLV's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
OALC
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF
0.53%0.61%0.70%0.40%0.40%0.06%
THLV
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
1.62%1.77%1.25%2.72%0.62%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OALC and THLV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THLV has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to OALC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs THLV's -13.15%.

On 3-year performance, OALC leads with 23.85% vs 12.59% for THLV. On fees, OALC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OALC has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OALC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for THLV.

THLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.53% for OALC.

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and THOR. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OALC and 0.64% for THLV.

OALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OALC and THLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer