OALC vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OALC (OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. OALC is actively managed, while FTIF is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, OALC returned 23.85%/yr vs 16.19%/yr for FTIF. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OALC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

OALC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.

OALC

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 6.75%
• YTD: 15.60%
• 6M: 16.26%
• 1Y: 32.95%
• 3Y*: 23.85%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OALC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	15.60%	20.36%	19.64%	18.43%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	25.81%	7.79%	0.50%	12.52%

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and FTIF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2023	0.61

The correlation between OALC and FTIF shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OALC vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OALC	FTIF
Technology	37.8%	4.1%
Financial Services	14.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	11.1%	3.2%
Communication Services	8.4%	-
Industrials	7.6%	16.5%
Healthcare	6.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Energy	2.5%	44.1%
Basic Materials	1.3%	20.1%
Real Estate	1.0%	12.1%

Return for Risk

OALC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC

OALC Risk / Return Rank: 79
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	2.48	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.41	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.93	6.79	-2.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.19	20.14	-1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OALC vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and FTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.56	2.48	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.75	-0.07

Drawdowns

OALC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-27.83%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.42%	-5.46%	-2.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-27.83%	+10.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.50%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-6.00%	-1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.84%	-0.02%

Volatility

OALC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is 3.42%, while First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that OALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.42%	4.05%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	10.55%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.94%	15.00%	-2.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	18.96%	-1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.28%	18.96%	-1.68%

OALC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

OALC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than FTIF's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.11%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	0.53%	0.61%	0.70%	0.40%	0.40%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OALC and FTIF in my portfolio?

OALC and FTIF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OALC or FTIF?

FTIF has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to OALC (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OALC dropped -26.82% vs FTIF's -27.83%.

Which ETF is better, OALC or FTIF?

On 3-year performance, OALC leads with 23.85% vs 16.19% for FTIF. On fees, OALC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, OALC has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OALC or FTIF?

Over the 3-year period, OALC has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OALC or FTIF?

OALC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OALC or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.53% for OALC.

What is the main difference between OALC and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Oneascent and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for OALC and 0.60% for FTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OALC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.