OALC vs. FTIF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF).

OALC and FTIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. OALC is an actively managed fund by Oneascent. It was launched on Nov 15, 2021. FTIF is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Mar 13, 2023.

Performance

OALC vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

OALC vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	-3.32%	20.36%	19.64%	18.43%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	19.63%	7.79%	0.50%	12.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OALC achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 19.63% return.

OALC

• 1D: 2.70%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 6M: -0.95%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 16.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 23.49%
• 1Y: 32.50%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OALC vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OALC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

FTIF

First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF

OALC

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF

Return for Risk

OALC vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OALC

OALC Risk / Return Rank: 71
OALC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
OALC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OALC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
OALC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
OALC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 78
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OALC vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.42	-0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	2.00	-0.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.93	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.19	9.48	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OALC vs. FTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OALC Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the FTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OALC and FTIF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.16	1.42	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.69	-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between OALC and FTIF is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

OALC vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

OALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than FTIF's 1.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OALC OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF	0.63%	0.61%	0.70%	0.40%	0.40%	0.06%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.17%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

OALC vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OALC drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OALC and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	-27.83%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.89%	-17.27%	+6.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.95%	-0.57%	-5.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-6.28%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.51%	-1.21%

Volatility

OALC vs. FTIF - Volatility Comparison

OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) at 4.25%. This indicates that OALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OALC	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	4.25%	+1.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	11.64%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.88%	22.96%	-5.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.41%	19.28%	-1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	19.28%	-1.87%