OAKWX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Oakmark Global Select Fund (OAKWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
OAKWX is managed by Oakmark. It was launched on Oct 1, 2006. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKWX Oakmark Global Select Fund | -8.12% | 20.73% | 4.68% | 22.72% | -22.48% | 25.99% | 13.04% | 29.82% | -21.20% | 21.15% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKWX achieves a -8.12% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OAKWX having a 8.41% annualized return and FGIAX not far ahead at 8.78%.
OAKWX
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 6M
- -6.66%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.31%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKWX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OAKWX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
OAKWX
FGIAX
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark Global Select Fund (OAKWX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 1.79 | -1.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 2.30 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.36 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 2.73 | -2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 12.62 | -12.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 1.79 | -1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.80 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKWX and FGIAX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
OAKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OAKWX Oakmark Global Select Fund | 1.56% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 0.83% | 0.33% | 14.91% | 0.00% | 1.17% | 5.28% | 5.48% | 1.00% | 5.60% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKWX drawdown since its inception was -54.43%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKWX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.43% | -49.35% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -8.29% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.79% | -21.08% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -38.02% | -4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.38% | -3.06% | -9.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -7.22% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 1.79% | +2.23% |
Volatility
OAKWX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark Global Select Fund (OAKWX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that OAKWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OAKWX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 4.15% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 7.07% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 12.28% | +3.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 13.08% | +3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 15.17% | +3.98% |