OAKM vs. FDL
OAKM (Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. OAKM is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past year, OAKM returned 13.56% vs 23.67% for FDL. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OAKM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
OAKM vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OAKM achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.
OAKM
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 13.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
OAKM vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | -2.01% | 21.46% | -4.83% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | -5.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKM and FDL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between OAKM and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKM vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
OAKM
FDL
OAKM vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OAKM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.37 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 5.56 | -3.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 13.56 | -8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OAKM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 2.11 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.45 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
OAKM vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKM drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKM and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -65.93% | +50.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | -4.27% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.44% | -2.18% | -2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -9.66% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.75% | +1.01% |
Volatility
OAKM vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that OAKM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKM | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 2.85% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 7.87% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 11.28% | +1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 14.31% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.11% | -0.60% |
OAKM vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKM vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
OAKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.68% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKM and FDL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OAKM has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OAKM dropped -15.24% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 1-year performance, FDL leads with 23.67% vs 13.56% for OAKM. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FDL has performed better with a 23.67% return vs 13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for OAKM.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.68% for OAKM.
They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OAKM and 0.45% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OAKM and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer