OAKM vs. MFVL
OAKM (Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OAKM charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
OAKM vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OAKM having a 6.38% return and MFVL slightly lower at 6.37%.
OAKM
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- YTD
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.03%
MFVL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.62K | $51.56K | $91.97K | |
| $4.67M | $4.31M | $6.02M |
OAKM vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | 6.38% | 2.68% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 6.37% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between OAKM and MFVL is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OAKM vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
OAKM
MFVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OAKM vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OAKM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OAKM vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OAKM drawdown since its inception was -15.24%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OAKM and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OAKM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.24% | -7.03% | -8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -1.89% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.70% | -2.53% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility
OAKM vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OAKM | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 13.82% | -0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 13.82% | +2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 13.82% | +2.49% |
OAKM vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
OAKM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
OAKM vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
OAKM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OAKM Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OAKM and MFVL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for OAKM.
OAKM has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Oakmark and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for OAKM and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for OAKM and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer