NZUS vs. ROUS
NZUS (SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - NZUS tracks the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NZUS returned 20.11%/yr vs 20.87%/yr for ROUS. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NZUS charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
NZUS vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than ROUS's 16.55% return.
NZUS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
NZUS vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZUS SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 5.51% | 13.95% | 24.34% | 29.16% | -14.34% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between NZUS and ROUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between NZUS and ROUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NZUS vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NZUS
ROUS
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
NZUS
ROUS
Financial Services
NZUS
ROUS
Real Estate
NZUS
ROUS
Communication Services
NZUS
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
NZUS
ROUS
Healthcare
NZUS
ROUS
Industrials
NZUS
ROUS
Utilities
NZUS
ROUS
Energy
NZUS
ROUS
Basic Materials
NZUS
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
NZUS
-
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NZUS vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
NZUS
ROUS
NZUS vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NZUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.46 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 4.95 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 20.38 | -13.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NZUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.60 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.67 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
NZUS vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NZUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.99% | -35.51% | +14.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -5.97% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.99% | -15.81% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | 0.00% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -4.24% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 1.45% | +1.91% |
Volatility
NZUS vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.54%. This indicates that NZUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NZUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.54% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 8.50% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 11.37% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 14.38% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 16.96% | +1.65% |
NZUS vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NZUS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NZUS vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than ROUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NZUS SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF | 0.60% | 0.89% | 5.49% | 1.07% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NZUS and ROUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NZUS has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZUS dropped -20.99% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 3-year performance, ROUS leads with 20.87% vs 20.11% for NZUS. On fees, NZUS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 20.87% return vs 20.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NZUS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.60% for NZUS.
NZUS tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for NZUS and 0.19% for ROUS.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NZUS and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer