PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NZUS vs. EFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NZUS vs. EFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NZUS vs. EFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
-8.31%13.95%24.34%29.16%-14.34%
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
-4.39%18.47%23.80%27.92%-11.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZUS achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than EFIV's -4.39% return.


NZUS

1D
3.30%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
-8.31%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
12.87%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
10Y*

EFIV

1D
2.85%
1M
-5.17%
YTD
-4.39%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
18.43%
5Y*
12.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NZUS vs. EFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NZUS and EFIV have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

NZUS vs. EFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZUS
NZUS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NZUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NZUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NZUS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NZUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
NZUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EFIV
EFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
EFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZUS vs. EFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NZUSEFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

1.06

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.62

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.61

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.76

7.57

-3.81

NZUS vs. EFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the EFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZUS and EFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NZUSEFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.06

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.92

-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between NZUS and EFIV is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

NZUS vs. EFIV - Dividend Comparison

NZUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than EFIV's 1.08% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
NZUS
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
0.98%0.89%5.49%1.07%1.22%0.00%0.00%
EFIV
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
1.08%1.03%1.20%1.37%1.64%1.19%0.65%

Drawdowns

NZUS vs. EFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZUS drawdown since its inception was -20.99%, smaller than the maximum EFIV drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZUS and EFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NZUSEFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-24.52%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-12.50%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-6.86%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-4.92%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

2.65%

+0.94%

Volatility

NZUS vs. EFIV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZUS) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF (EFIV) at 5.18%. This indicates that NZUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NZUSEFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

5.18%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.42%

9.22%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

18.16%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

16.94%

+1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

16.96%

+1.82%