NZAC vs. NXTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NZAC (SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF) and NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) are both Global Equities funds. NZAC is passively managed, while NXTE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NZAC returned 17.81%/yr vs 19.20%/yr for NXTE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NZAC charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for NXTE.

Performance

NZAC vs. NXTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NZAC achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than NXTE's 33.79% return.

NZAC

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: -1.26%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 6M: 5.37%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 17.81%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

NXTE

• 1D: -5.19%
• 1M: 7.82%
• YTD: 33.79%
• 6M: 32.71%
• 1Y: 54.95%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NZAC vs. NXTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	6.02%	20.55%	16.67%	23.22%	7.03%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	33.79%	21.84%	-3.42%	13.85%	-1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between NZAC and NXTE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022	0.82

The correlation between NZAC and NXTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NZAC vs. NXTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NZAC

NZAC Risk / Return Rank: 47
NZAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NZAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
NZAC Omega Ratio Rank: 45
NZAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NZAC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 69
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NZAC vs. NXTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NZAC	NXTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.99	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.62	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.34	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	4.04	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	12.46	-3.84

NZAC vs. NXTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NZAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the NXTE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NZAC and NXTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NZAC vs. NXTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NZAC drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, which is greater than NXTE's maximum drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NZAC and NXTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	NZAC	NXTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.72%	-28.64%	-5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.10%	-13.68%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.19%	-27.24%	+11.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.38%	-5.19%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-7.82%	+2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.40%	4.42%	-2.02%

Volatility

NZAC vs. NXTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) is 5.41%, while Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a volatility of 14.78%. This indicates that NZAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NZAC	NXTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	14.78%	-9.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.34%	23.23%	-11.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.73%	27.70%	-13.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	26.71%	-9.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.13%	26.71%	-9.58%

NZAC vs. NXTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

NZAC has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTE's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

NZAC vs. NXTE - Dividend Comparison

NZAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than NXTE's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NZAC SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF	2.09%	1.90%	1.88%	1.65%	1.81%	1.62%	1.59%	2.17%	2.53%	2.20%	2.00%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NZAC and NXTE in my portfolio?

NZAC and NXTE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NZAC or NXTE?

NXTE has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to NZAC (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NZAC dropped -33.72% vs NXTE's -28.64%.

Which ETF is better, NZAC or NXTE?

On 3-year performance, NXTE leads with 19.20% vs 17.81% for NZAC. On fees, NZAC is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, NZAC has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NZAC or NXTE?

Over the 3-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 19.20% return vs 17.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NZAC or NXTE?

NZAC is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NZAC or NXTE?

NZAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.38% for NXTE.

What is the main difference between NZAC and NXTE?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and AXS. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NZAC and 1.00% for NXTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.