NXTI vs. TRND

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NXTI (Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF) and TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - NXTI tracks the NEXT Intangible Core Index while TRND tracks the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NXTI returned 16.80% vs 21.50% for TRND. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NXTI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for TRND.

Performance

NXTI vs. TRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTI achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than TRND's 10.26% return.

NXTI

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 10.44%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRND

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 10.26%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 6.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTI vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NXTI Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF	8.08%	16.73%	16.21%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	10.26%	6.03%	9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTI and TRND is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2024	0.80

The correlation between NXTI and TRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

NXTI vs. TRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXTI	TRND
Technology	43.3%	30.6%
Financial Services	11.2%	13.2%
Healthcare	9.7%	7.4%
Industrials	9.5%	13.4%
Consumer Defensive	8.2%	5.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	10.0%
Communication Services	4.7%	7.7%
Energy	3.6%	3.8%
Utilities	2.0%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.5%	2.7%
Basic Materials	0.9%	3.4%

Return for Risk

NXTI vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTI

NXTI Risk / Return Rank: 29
NXTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
NXTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
NXTI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NXTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
NXTI Martin Ratio Rank: 26

TRND

TRND Risk / Return Rank: 58
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 57
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTI vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NXTI	TRND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.92	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.73	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	2.70	-1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.50	11.32	-7.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NXTI vs. TRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the TRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTI and TRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NXTI	TRND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.92	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.15	0.65	+0.50

Drawdowns

NXTI vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTI drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTI and TRND.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTI	TRND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.65%	-17.88%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.99%	-8.00%	-4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.91%	-0.29%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.23%	-5.22%	+1.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.82%	1.90%	+2.92%

Volatility

NXTI vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison

Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) at 3.48%. This indicates that NXTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTI	TRND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.48%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.66%	8.97%	+2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.72%	11.23%	+3.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.14%	9.71%	+7.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.14%	11.18%	+5.96%

NXTI vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTI vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison

NXTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than TRND's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NXTI Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF	0.58%	0.62%	3.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF	2.10%	2.32%	2.31%	2.51%	1.76%	0.93%	0.60%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTI and TRND in my portfolio?

NXTI and TRND have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTI or TRND?

NXTI has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to TRND (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTI dropped -19.65% vs TRND's -17.88%.

Which ETF is better, NXTI or TRND?

On 1-year performance, TRND leads with 21.50% vs 16.80% for NXTI. On fees, NXTI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTI or TRND?

Over the 1-year period, TRND has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 16.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTI or TRND?

NXTI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTI or TRND?

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.58% for NXTI.

What is the main difference between NXTI and TRND?

NXTI tracks NEXT Intangible Core Index, while TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NXTI and 0.77% for TRND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.