PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTI vs. MTBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTI vs. MTBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTI achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly higher than MTBA's -0.06% return.


NXTI

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.40%
6M
3.62%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MTBA

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTI vs. MTBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NXTI
Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF
5.40%16.73%16.21%
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
-0.06%7.74%3.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTI and MTBA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2024

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTI vs. MTBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTI
NXTI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NXTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MTBA
MTBA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MTBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTBA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MTBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTBA Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTI vs. MTBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) and Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTIMTBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.57

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

4.96

-1.99

NXTI vs. MTBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the MTBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTI and MTBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTI vs. MTBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTI drawdown since its inception was -19.65%, which is greater than MTBA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTI and MTBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTIMTBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.65%

-3.48%

-16.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-2.82%

-10.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-1.44%

-1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-0.80%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

0.89%

+3.98%

Volatility

NXTI vs. MTBA - Volatility Comparison

Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Simplify MBS ETF (MTBA) at 0.96%. This indicates that NXTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MTBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTIMTBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

0.96%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

2.57%

+9.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

3.10%

+12.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

3.95%

+13.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

3.95%

+13.21%

NXTI vs. MTBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTBA's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NXTI vs. MTBA - Dividend Comparison

NXTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than MTBA's 6.08% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MTBA
Simplify MBS ETF
6.08%5.98%6.03%0.48%
NXTI
Simplify NEXT Intangible Core Index ETF
0.59%0.62%3.70%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTI and MTBA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTI has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to MTBA (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTI dropped -19.65% vs MTBA's -3.48%.

On 1-year performance, NXTI leads with 14.41% vs 4.42% for MTBA. On fees, MTBA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MTBA has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NXTI has performed better with a 14.41% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTBA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for NXTI.

MTBA has the higher dividend yield at 6.08%, compared with 0.59% for NXTI.

NXTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTBA is Mortgage Backed Securities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for NXTI and 0.15% for MTBA.

MTBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTI and MTBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer