PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 54.54% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, NXTG has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 17.94%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


NXTG

1D
-0.82%
1M
22.84%
YTD
54.54%
6M
55.39%
1Y
82.82%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
17.94%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
54.54%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-17.25%28.02%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and FDL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2011

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between NXTG and FDL has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NXTG vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTG
FDL

Technology

66.1%
1.1%

Communication Services

21.7%
10.6%

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Industrials

4.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
3.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.7%

Energy

-

27.3%

Financial Services

-

15.1%

Healthcare

-

16.8%

Utilities

-

6.5%

Technology

NXTG
66.1%
FDL
1.1%

Communication Services

NXTG
21.7%
FDL
10.6%

Real Estate

NXTG
7.5%
FDL

-

Industrials

NXTG
4.3%
FDL
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

NXTG
0.4%
FDL
3.8%

Basic Materials

NXTG

-

FDL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

NXTG

-

FDL
14.7%

Energy

NXTG

-

FDL
27.3%

Financial Services

NXTG

-

FDL
15.1%

Healthcare

NXTG

-

FDL
16.8%

Utilities

NXTG

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTGFDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.52

2.11

+2.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.69

3.25

+2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.37

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.10

5.56

+2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.73

13.56

+18.17

NXTG vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG Sharpe Ratio is 4.52, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTGFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.52

2.11

+2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

0.88

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.66

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.45

+0.24

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTGFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-65.93%

+32.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-4.27%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-12.24%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-16.46%

-17.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-41.40%

+7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.18%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-9.66%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

1.75%

+0.87%

Volatility

NXTG vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that NXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTGFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

2.85%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.26%

7.87%

+7.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.44%

11.28%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

14.31%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

17.11%

+1.77%

NXTG vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.11%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG and FDL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, NXTG leads with 17.94% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.11% for NXTG.

NXTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.45% for FDL.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer