PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. INFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. INFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than INFL's 18.15% return.


NXTE

1D
-0.69%
1M
14.44%
YTD
35.18%
6M
33.52%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10Y*

INFL

1D
0.81%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
18.15%
6M
18.37%
1Y
24.99%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
35.18%21.84%-3.42%13.85%-1.33%
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
18.15%18.30%23.34%1.62%13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and INFL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022

0.57

The correlation between NXTE and INFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXTE vs. INFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTE
INFL

Technology

48.5%

-

Industrials

17.6%
1.8%

Healthcare

11.3%
1.2%

Real Estate

10.9%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Utilities

2.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
0.3%

Financial Services

1.5%
21.1%

Basic Materials

0.5%
20.0%

Energy

-

40.5%

Technology

NXTE
48.5%
INFL

-

Industrials

NXTE
17.6%
INFL
1.8%

Healthcare

NXTE
11.3%
INFL
1.2%

Real Estate

NXTE
10.9%
INFL
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NXTE
4.1%
INFL

-

Utilities

NXTE
2.2%
INFL
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

NXTE
2.1%
INFL
2.4%

Communication Services

NXTE
1.9%
INFL
0.3%

Financial Services

NXTE
1.5%
INFL
21.1%

Basic Materials

NXTE
0.5%
INFL
20.0%

Energy

NXTE

-

INFL
40.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

INFL
INFL Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
INFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFL Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
INFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFL Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTEINFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.29

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

3.00

+1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

8.16

+6.48

NXTE vs. INFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the INFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and INFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTEINFLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.62

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.92

-0.26

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than INFL's maximum drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and INFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTEINFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-21.30%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-8.36%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

-15.56%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-4.75%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-5.10%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

3.07%

+1.19%

Volatility

NXTE vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) at 3.71%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTEINFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

3.71%

+5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

12.29%

+7.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

15.54%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.98%

17.71%

+8.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.98%

17.64%

+8.34%

NXTE vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than INFL's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
0.90%1.26%1.77%1.60%1.65%0.91%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and INFL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to INFL (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs INFL's -21.30%.

On 3-year performance, INFL leads with 22.33% vs 18.45% for NXTE. On fees, INFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, INFL has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, INFL has performed better with a 22.33% return vs 18.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.85% for INFL.

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and INFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer