PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INFL vs. FFLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


INFLFFLC
YTD Return32.32%32.65%
1Y Return39.95%43.08%
3Y Return (Ann)10.87%18.04%
Sharpe Ratio2.943.42
Sortino Ratio3.824.58
Omega Ratio1.511.63
Calmar Ratio3.385.09
Martin Ratio17.5424.52
Ulcer Index2.31%1.86%
Daily Std Dev13.80%13.23%
Max Drawdown-21.30%-15.86%
Current Drawdown-1.46%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between INFL and FFLC is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

INFL vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with INFL having a 32.32% return and FFLC slightly higher at 32.65%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
26.25%
13.91%
INFL
FFLC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INFL vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
Expense ratio chart for INFL: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for FFLC: current value at 0.38% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.38%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

INFL vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INFL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INFL, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.94
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for INFL, currently valued at 3.82, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for INFL, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for INFL, currently valued at 3.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.38
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for INFL, currently valued at 17.54, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0017.54
FFLC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.42
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.63
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 5.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.005.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FFLC, currently valued at 24.52, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0024.52

INFL vs. FFLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and FFLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.94
3.42
INFL
FFLC

Dividends

INFL vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than FFLC's 0.67% yield.


TTM2023202220212020
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
1.41%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.67%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

INFL vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -15.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.46%
0
INFL
FFLC

Volatility

INFL vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) is 3.69%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that INFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.69%
4.05%
INFL
FFLC