PortfoliosLab logo
INFL vs. FFLC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between INFL and FFLC is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

INFL vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
73.53%
81.98%
INFL
FFLC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INFL:

1.42

FFLC:

0.38

Sortino Ratio

INFL:

1.95

FFLC:

0.69

Omega Ratio

INFL:

1.28

FFLC:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

INFL:

1.87

FFLC:

0.40

Martin Ratio

INFL:

5.92

FFLC:

1.47

Ulcer Index

INFL:

4.91%

FFLC:

5.37%

Daily Std Dev

INFL:

20.12%

FFLC:

19.84%

Max Drawdown

INFL:

-21.30%

FFLC:

-19.72%

Current Drawdown

INFL:

-3.72%

FFLC:

-8.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's -3.25% return.


INFL

YTD

8.08%

1M

14.02%

6M

-0.03%

1Y

28.28%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FFLC

YTD

-3.25%

1M

14.33%

6M

-6.33%

1Y

7.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


INFL vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

INFL vs. FFLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INFL is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INFL is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INFL is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INFL is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INFL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INFL is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FFLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FFLC is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FFLC is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FFLC is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INFL vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current INFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the FFLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFL and FFLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.42
0.38
INFL
FFLC

Dividends

INFL vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison

INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than FFLC's 0.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020
INFL
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF
1.68%1.78%1.60%1.65%0.91%0.00%
FFLC
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF
0.98%0.82%0.57%1.67%1.68%0.89%

Drawdowns

INFL vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-3.72%
-8.21%
INFL
FFLC

Volatility

INFL vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) is 8.55%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that INFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.55%
10.85%
INFL
FFLC