INFL vs. SPY
INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - INFL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Horizon Kinetics LLC, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. INFL is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, INFL returned 13.12%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SPY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. INFL charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
INFL vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, INFL achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 10.91% return.
INFL
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
INFL vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 17.21% | 18.30% | 23.34% | 1.62% | 2.65% | 24.77% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 27.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between INFL and SPY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between INFL and SPY has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
INFL vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
INFL
SPY
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Energy
INFL
SPY
Financial Services
INFL
SPY
Basic Materials
INFL
SPY
Utilities
INFL
SPY
Consumer Defensive
INFL
SPY
Industrials
INFL
SPY
Healthcare
INFL
SPY
Real Estate
INFL
SPY
Communication Services
INFL
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
INFL
-
SPY
Technology
INFL
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
INFL vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
INFL
SPY
INFL vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| INFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.52 | 2.38 | -0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 3.24 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.43 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 3.16 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.68 | 14.72 | -7.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| INFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.38 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.59 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
INFL vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum INFL drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFL and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| INFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -55.19% | +33.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -8.88% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -18.76% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -24.50% | +3.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -0.70% | -4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -9.05% | +3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.91% | +1.15% |
Volatility
INFL vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that INFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| INFL | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 2.84% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 8.90% | +3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 11.83% | +3.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 17.05% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 17.94% | -0.30% |
INFL vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
INFL has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
INFL vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.91% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
INFL and SPY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFL has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INFL dropped -21.30% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 5-year performance, SPY leads with 13.83% vs 13.12% for INFL. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPY has performed better with a 13.83% return vs 13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.
SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.91% for INFL.
INFL is categorized as Global Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Horizon Kinetics LLC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for INFL and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for INFL and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer