NWHQX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
NWHQX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on May 29, 2001. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund | -15.35% | 18.58% | 26.23% | 63.66% | -37.23% | 19.21% | 50.97% | 38.91% | -3.16% | 38.22% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -10.59% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHQX achieves a -15.35% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -10.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHQX having a 17.17% annualized return and SCHG not far behind at 16.83%.
NWHQX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -10.15%
- YTD
- -15.35%
- 6M
- -17.09%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.17%
SCHG
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -10.59%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.91%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 16.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWHQX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
NWHQX
SCHG
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWHQX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.75 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.70 | 1.23 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.17 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 1.03 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | 3.54 | -2.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWHQX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.75 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.57 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHQX and SCHG is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NWHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.83%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund | 13.83% | 11.71% | 12.90% | 6.49% | 11.34% | 17.51% | 11.54% | 7.38% | 17.44% | 10.29% | 7.72% | 8.63% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHQX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHQX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHQX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -34.59% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.34% | -16.41% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.61% | -34.59% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | -34.59% | -8.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.34% | -13.34% | -8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -5.22% | -1.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.74% | 4.78% | +1.96% |
Volatility
NWHQX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 6.95% and 6.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWHQX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.95% | 6.67% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.65% | 12.51% | +4.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.22% | 22.43% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 22.32% | +3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 21.51% | +3.55% |