NWHQX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
NWHQX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on May 29, 2001. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund | -10.31% | 18.58% | 26.23% | 63.66% | -37.23% | 19.21% | 50.97% | 38.91% | -3.16% | 38.22% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -7.59% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHQX achieves a -10.31% return, which is significantly lower than JLGMX's -7.59% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHQX having a 17.84% annualized return and JLGMX not far ahead at 18.35%.
NWHQX
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -13.44%
- 1Y
- 14.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWHQX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHQX
JLGMX
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWHQX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 2.61 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWHQX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.85 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.80 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHQX and JLGMX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
NWHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, more than JLGMX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund | 13.05% | 11.71% | 12.90% | 6.49% | 11.34% | 17.51% | 11.54% | 7.38% | 17.44% | 10.29% | 7.72% | 8.63% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 11.95% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHQX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHQX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHQX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -31.82% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.34% | -16.73% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.61% | -31.13% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | -31.82% | -10.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.67% | -13.00% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.15% | -5.83% | -1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 5.57% | +1.34% |
Volatility
NWHQX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 6.50%. This indicates that NWHQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWHQX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 6.50% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 12.58% | +4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.57% | 21.16% | +6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 20.25% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.10% | 21.54% | +3.56% |