NWHFX vs. WSCVX
NWHFX (Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund) and WSCVX (Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, NWHFX returned 37.16% vs 46.03% for WSCVX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWHFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for WSCVX.
Performance
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly lower than WSCVX's 22.71% return.
NWHFX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 18.23%
- 1Y
- 37.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.65%
WSCVX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- 46.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 18.47% | 9.95% | 10.23% | 13.06% |
WSCVX Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund | 22.71% | 13.80% | 29.11% | 7.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHFX and WSCVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between NWHFX and WSCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHFX vs. WSCVX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHFX
WSCVX
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWHFX | WSCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.47 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 5.45 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 17.86 | -1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWHFX | WSCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.79 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.26 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than WSCVX's maximum drawdown of -22.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and WSCVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHFX | WSCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.51% | -22.34% | -25.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -8.96% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -4.27% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.73% | -0.31% |
Volatility
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) is 4.49%, while Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that NWHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHFX | WSCVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 5.42% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 11.65% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 17.55% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 22.09% | -1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 22.09% | +0.70% |
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than WSCVX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHFX vs. WSCVX - Dividend Comparison
NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, less than WSCVX's 10.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 9.78% | 11.48% | 13.85% | 1.38% | 3.31% | 4.98% | 0.83% | 0.65% | 15.39% | 11.63% | 0.62% | 1.21% |
WSCVX Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund | 10.78% | 13.23% | 28.71% | 9.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWHFX and WSCVX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSCVX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to NWHFX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs WSCVX's -22.34%.
WSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHFX and WSCVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer